BACKGROUND:Topical 2-octylcyanoacrylate tissue (OCA) adhesive has been used as an alternative to close wounds with a comparable cosmetic outcome. The use of 2-OCA in the closure of abdominal laparotomy wounds has not been thoroughly evaluated. Our aim was to compare 2-OCA with conventional skin stapling devices in colorectal surgery. METHODS: A prospective randomised study was conducted in which 74 consecutive patients above the age of 21 undergoing open elective colectomies for benign or malignant indications were allocated to skin closure with 2-OCA or skin staples. Cosmetic outcome as assessed with the Hollander Cosmesis Scale with a single assessor, complication rates, and patient satisfaction were recorded at discharge (4-10POD) 2 weeks after discharge and then at 3 months. RESULTS: Of the 74 patients, 38 were randomised to skin staples and 36 to 2-OCA. There was no significant difference in cosmetic outcomes between the two groups as assessed with a visual analogue scale or the Hollander Cosmesis Scale but showed a trend to better cosmetic outcomes in the 2-OCA group. Patient satisfaction scores were higher but did not reach statistical significance. The time taken to close a wound with 2-OCA was significantly longer than with skin staples. There was no statistical difference in rates of wound infection. CONCLUSION:2-OCA is a safe and effective means of skin closure in patients undergoing elective colectomies with a good and at least equivalent outcome to traditional methods of closure.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Topical 2-octylcyanoacrylate tissue (OCA) adhesive has been used as an alternative to close wounds with a comparable cosmetic outcome. The use of 2-OCA in the closure of abdominal laparotomy wounds has not been thoroughly evaluated. Our aim was to compare 2-OCA with conventional skin stapling devices in colorectal surgery. METHODS: A prospective randomised study was conducted in which 74 consecutive patients above the age of 21 undergoing open elective colectomies for benign or malignant indications were allocated to skin closure with 2-OCA or skin staples. Cosmetic outcome as assessed with the Hollander Cosmesis Scale with a single assessor, complication rates, and patient satisfaction were recorded at discharge (4-10POD) 2 weeks after discharge and then at 3 months. RESULTS: Of the 74 patients, 38 were randomised to skin staples and 36 to 2-OCA. There was no significant difference in cosmetic outcomes between the two groups as assessed with a visual analogue scale or the Hollander Cosmesis Scale but showed a trend to better cosmetic outcomes in the 2-OCA group. Patient satisfaction scores were higher but did not reach statistical significance. The time taken to close a wound with 2-OCA was significantly longer than with skin staples. There was no statistical difference in rates of wound infection. CONCLUSION: 2-OCA is a safe and effective means of skin closure in patients undergoing elective colectomies with a good and at least equivalent outcome to traditional methods of closure.
Authors: Patricia M Mertz; Stephen C Davis; Alejandro L Cazzaniga; Anna Drosou; William H Eaglstein Journal: J Cutan Med Surg Date: 2002-10-09 Impact factor: 2.092
Authors: Phillip N V Blondeel; John W Murphy; Denis Debrosse; James C Nix; Larry E Puls; Nicholas Theodore; Paul Coulthard Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: David García Cerdá; Antonio Martín Ballester; Alicia Aliena-Valero; Anna Carabén-Redaño; José M Lloris Journal: Surg Today Date: 2014-10-25 Impact factor: 2.549
Authors: A G K McNair; R N Whistance; R O Forsythe; J Rees; J E Jones; A M Pullyblank; K N L Avery; S T Brookes; M G Thomas; P A Sylvester; A Russell; A Oliver; D Morton; R Kennedy; D G Jayne; R Huxtable; R Hackett; S J Dutton; M G Coleman; M Card; J Brown; J M Blazeby Journal: Colorectal Dis Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 3.788