PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the mid-term results, success rates, and time-to-failure of secondary endoscopic third ventriculostomy (secondary ETV), as well as the complex management of preoperative and postoperative cares. METHODS: To this purpose, a retrospective analysis of a pediatric population of 22 children who underwent endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) after shunt malfunction (secondary ETV) was performed. RESULTS: The failure rate, given by the percentage of new shunt replacement in the first 3 months after ETV, was 36%, with a mean time to failure of 14.3 days. All the failures were evident within 1 month after the ETV. Despite the small number of patients in our series, we found no significant correlation between ETV failure and both patient age and hydrocephalus etiology (p = 0.47 and p = 0.78, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, ETV secondary to shunt malfunction in pediatric patients has a success rate of 64%. As it is a safe and rapid treatment option even in emergency conditions, it is worth performing this procedure in previously shunted children.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the mid-term results, success rates, and time-to-failure of secondary endoscopic third ventriculostomy (secondary ETV), as well as the complex management of preoperative and postoperative cares. METHODS: To this purpose, a retrospective analysis of a pediatric population of 22 children who underwent endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) after shunt malfunction (secondary ETV) was performed. RESULTS: The failure rate, given by the percentage of new shunt replacement in the first 3 months after ETV, was 36%, with a mean time to failure of 14.3 days. All the failures were evident within 1 month after the ETV. Despite the small number of patients in our series, we found no significant correlation between ETV failure and both patient age and hydrocephalus etiology (p = 0.47 and p = 0.78, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, ETV secondary to shunt malfunction in pediatric patients has a success rate of 64%. As it is a safe and rapid treatment option even in emergency conditions, it is worth performing this procedure in previously shunted children.
Authors: V Siomin; H Weiner; J Wisoff; G Cinalli; A Pierre-Kahn; C Saint-Rose; R Abbott; H Elran; L Beni-Adani; G Ouaknine; S Constantini Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: G Cinalli; C Sainte-Rose; P Chumas; M Zerah; F Brunelle; G Lot; A Pierre-Kahn; D Renier Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 1999-03 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Abhaya V Kulkarni; James M Drake; Conor L Mallucci; Spyros Sgouros; Jonathan Roth; Shlomi Constantini Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2009-05-15 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Radim Lipina; Stefan Reguli; Viera Dolezilová; Marie Kuncíková; Hana Podesvová Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2008-03-15 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: Moisés Heleno Vieira Braga; Gervásio Teles C de Carvalho; Rafael Augusto Castro Santiago Brandão; Franklin Bernardes Faraj de Lima; Bruno Silva Costa Journal: Arq Neuropsiquiatr Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 1.420