Literature DB >> 20352167

Comorbidities, alone and in combination with D-dimer, as risk factors for recurrence after a first episode of unprovoked venous thromboembolism in the extended follow-up of the PROLONG study.

Benilde Cosmi1, Cristina Legnani, Alberto Tosetto, Vittorio Pengo, Angelo Ghirarduzzi, Sophie Testa, Domenico Prisco, Daniela Poli, Armando Tripodi, Gualtiero Palareti.   

Abstract

The PROLONG randomised clinical trial showed that an abnormal D-dimer at one month after vitamin K antagonist (VKA) suspension for a first episode of unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE) is associated with a higher risk of recurrence. However, other patient characteristics, such as comorbidities, in combination with D-dimer could also influence the recurrence risk. It was the objective of this study to assess the predictive value of comorbidities and D-dimer in combination for recurrence after withdrawal of VKA in patients enrolled in the PROLONG study. On the day of VKA suspension, the presence of known (coronary, peripheral,cerebral) vascular disease, chronic inflammatory bowel disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, autoimmune disease, diabetes, arterial hypertension, obesity and dyslipidaemias was registered. D-dimer was measured at 30 +/- 10 days afterwards. The primary outcome was recurrent objectively documented VTE. Mean follow-up was 2.55 years. An abnormal D-dimer was observed in 44% (135/309) of patients with comorbidities and in 29% (87/299) of patients without (p=0.0003). An on-treatment analysis was conducted in 483 patients in whom VKAs were not resumed. In patients with a normal D-dimer, recurrences were observed in 14.3% (24/168) of patients with comorbidities and 10.8% (22/203) of subjects without (p=ns). In patients with an abnormal D-dimer, recurrences were observed in 24.6% (16/65) patients with comorbidities and 21.3% (10/47) of patients without (p=ns). Although abnormal D-dimer levels were significantly more frequent in patients with comorbidities, D-dimer was an independent risk factor for recurrence and the presence of comorbidities did not increase the risk of recurrence associated with an abnormal post-anticoagulation D-dimer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20352167     DOI: 10.1160/TH09-11-0759

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 0340-6245            Impact factor:   5.249


  3 in total

Review 1.  Extended anticoagulation for unprovoked venous thromboembolism: a majority of patients should be treated.

Authors:  Clive Kearon
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  The prediction role of D-dimer in recurrence of venous thromboembolism 1-year after anticoagulation discontinuing following idiopathic deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Babak Tamizifar; Padideh Oghab; Morteza Abdar Esfahani
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.852

3.  Management of patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism: an evidence-based and practical approach.

Authors:  Maura Marcucci; Alfonso Iorio; James Douketis
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2013-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.