Literature DB >> 20351790

Determinants of primary care physicians' referral pattern: a structural equation model approach.

Kyusuk Chung1, Duckhye Yang, Jun Hyup Lee.   

Abstract

This study examines patient referrals by primary care physicians (PCP) with nurse practitioners and physician assistants (NP-PA) in their medical practices as compared to practices without them. The study uses data from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation community tracking study (CTS) Physician Survey, Round I (1996-97) and II (1998-99). Structural equations with binary dependent variables were used to examine the links among managed care, the use of NP-PA, the complexity of patient's conditions, and the number of referrals. PCP's with NP-PA were found to have a greater likelihood of treating patients with complex conditions instead of referring them to specialists. Managed care related variables (i.e., large group practice/HMO, the percentage of patients for whom PCPs acted as gatekeepers, and the percentage of managed care revenue from capitated/prepaid contracts) affected PCP' patient referrals, but only through the increased use of NP-PA. PCP's with NP-PA were also found to provide appropriate care to the complex patients. These findings indicate that NP-PA enable PCP to concentrate on patients with more complex conditions thus reducing the number of referrals. In addition, NP-PA is found to affect the gatekeeper role of PCPs.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 20351790      PMCID: PMC2846366          DOI: 10.1504/ijpp.2010.030607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Public Pol        ISSN: 1740-0600


  15 in total

1.  Medscape's response to the Institute of Medicine Report: Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century.

Authors:  M Leavitt
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2001-03-05

2.  Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness.

Authors:  Thomas Bodenheimer; Edward H Wagner; Kevin Grumbach
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-10-09       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Benefits of and barriers to large medical group practice in the United States.

Authors:  Lawrence P Casalino; Kelly J Devers; Timothy K Lake; Marie Reed; Jeffrey J Stoddard
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2003-09-08

4.  Variations in nurse practitioner use in Veterans Affairs primary care practices.

Authors:  Patty Y Huang; Elizabeth M Yano; Martin L Lee; Betty L Chang; Lisa V Rubenstein
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Physician assistants and nurse practitioners: the United States experience.

Authors:  Roderick S Hooker
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2006-07-03       Impact factor: 7.738

Review 6.  Health care workforce for the twenty-first century: the impact of nonphysician clinicians.

Authors:  R A Cooper
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 13.739

7.  Nurse practitioner redux.

Authors:  C D DeAngelis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-03-16       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Defining the future of primary care: what can we learn from patients?.

Authors:  Dana Gelb Safran
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-02-04       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Primary care outcomes in patients treated by nurse practitioners or physicians: a randomized trial.

Authors:  M O Mundinger; R L Kane; E R Lenz; A M Totten; W Y Tsai; P D Cleary; W T Friedewald; A L Siu; M L Shelanski
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-01-05       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  2 in total

1.  Health seeking behavior as a predictor of healthcare utilization in a population of patients with spinal pain.

Authors:  Derek Clewley; Dan Rhon; Timothy Flynn; Shane Koppenhaver; Chad Cook
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Complexity as a factor for task allocation among general practitioners and nurse practitioners: a narrative review.

Authors:  Robyn Cody; Stefan Gysin; Christoph Merlo; Armin Gemperli; Stefan Essig
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 2.497

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.