Literature DB >> 20350938

What was the immediate impact on population health of the recent fall in hormone replacement therapy prescribing in England? Ecological study.

Richard M Martin1, Benedict W Wheeler, Chris Metcalfe, David Gunnell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The publication in 2002 of the women's health initiative (WHI) trial revealed long-term risks and benefits of hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Increased cardiovascular disease, venous thromboembolism and breast cancer risks outweighed benefits on hip fracture, colorectal and endometrial cancer. We investigated whether the subsequent 50% fall in HRT use in England impacted on population rates of these outcomes.
METHODS: Time-series analysis of hospital admissions, incidence and mortality amongst women aged 50-69, England 1997-2006.
RESULTS: There was no relationship between reduced HRT prescribing after 2002 and trends in breast cancer, colorectal cancer or hip fracture. Amongst 50-59 year olds, the annual percentage change in venous thromboembolism hospitalizations fell from 0.0% [95% confidence interval (CI): -2.3 to 2.3%] between 1997 and 2000 to -5.7% (-7.7 to -3.6%) between 2000 and 2006 (P-value = 0.001); the annual change in endometrial cancer mortality increased from 0.7% (-3.2 to 4.8%) between 1997 and 2003 to 11.0% (0.2 to 22.9%) after 2003 (P-value = 0.07); and previously falling acute myocardial infarction hospitalizations (annual change: -6.8%) and stroke (-3.0%) stabilized (-0.4%) or increased (+0.8%), respectively, around 2001 (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: Although rates of venous thromboembolism (decline) and endometrial cancer mortality (increase) changed in line with WHI findings, the decline in venous thromboembolism may have started before 2002 and increased fatal endometrial cancers could be a chance finding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20350938     DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdq021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)        ISSN: 1741-3842            Impact factor:   2.341


  5 in total

1.  Impact of medicines regulatory risk communications in the UK on prescribing and clinical outcomes: Systematic review, time series analysis and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christopher J Weatherburn; Bruce Guthrie; Tobias Dreischulte; Daniel R Morales
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Postmenopausal hormone therapy: an Endocrine Society scientific statement.

Authors:  Richard J Santen; D Craig Allred; Stacy P Ardoin; David F Archer; Norman Boyd; Glenn D Braunstein; Henry G Burger; Graham A Colditz; Susan R Davis; Marco Gambacciani; Barbara A Gower; Victor W Henderson; Wael N Jarjour; Richard H Karas; Michael Kleerekoper; Roger A Lobo; JoAnn E Manson; Jo Marsden; Kathryn A Martin; Lisa Martin; JoAnn V Pinkerton; David R Rubinow; Helena Teede; Diane M Thiboutot; Wulf H Utian
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 3.  Current and emerging therapies for the treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Jill Waalen
Journal:  J Exp Pharmacol       Date:  2010-08-27

4.  Measuring the impact of medicines regulatory interventions - Systematic review and methodological considerations.

Authors:  Thomas Goedecke; Daniel R Morales; Alexandra Pacurariu; Xavier Kurz
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 5.  The Controversial History of Hormone Replacement Therapy.

Authors:  Angelo Cagnacci; Martina Venier
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 2.430

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.