Literature DB >> 20350786

A comparison of the prognostic value of early PSA test-based variables following external beam radiotherapy, with or without preceding androgen deprivation: analysis of data from the TROG 96.01 randomized trial.

David S Lamb1, James W Denham, David Joseph, John Matthews, Chris Atkinson, Nigel A Spry, Gillian Duchesne, Martin Ebert, Allison Steigler, Brett Delahunt, Catherine D'Este.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We sought to compare the prognostic value of early prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test-based variables for the 802 eligible patients treated in the Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group 96.01 randomized trial. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients in this trial had T2b, T2c, T3, and T4 N0 prostate cancer and were randomized to 0, 3, or 6 months of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (NADT) prior to and during radiation treatment at 66 Gy to the prostate and seminal vesicles. The early PSA test-based variables evaluated were the pretreatment initial PSA (iPSA) value, PSA values at 2 and 4 months into NADT, the PSA nadir (nPSA) value after radiation in all patients, and PSA response signatures in men receiving radiation. Comparisons of endpoints were made using Cox models of local progression-free survival, distant failure-free survival, biochemical failure-free survival, and prostate cancer-specific survival.
RESULTS: The nPSA value was a powerful predictor of all endpoints regardless of whether NADT was given before radiation. PSA response signatures also predicted all endpoints in men treated by radiation alone. iPSA and PSA results at 2 and 4 months into NADT predicted biochemical failure-free survival but not any of the clinical endpoints. nPSA values correlated with those of iPSA, Gleason grade, and T stage and were significantly higher in men receiving radiation alone than in those receiving NADT.
CONCLUSIONS: The postradiation nPSA value is the strongest prognostic indicator of all early PSA-based variables. However, its use as a surrogate endpoint needs to take into account its dependence on pretreatment variables and treatment method. Copyright Â
© 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20350786     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.10.071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  13 in total

1.  Time Interval to Biochemical Failure as a Surrogate End Point in Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer: Analysis of Randomized Trial NRG/RTOG 9202.

Authors:  James J Dignam; Daniel A Hamstra; Herbert Lepor; David Grignon; Harmar Brereton; Adam Currey; Seth Rosenthal; Kenneth L Zeitzer; Varagur M Venkatesan; Eric M Horwitz; Thomas M Pisansky; Howard M Sandler
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Prostate-Specific Antigen After Neoadjuvant Androgen Suppression in Prostate Cancer Patients Receiving Short-Term Androgen Suppression and External Beam Radiation Therapy: Pooled Analysis of Four NRG Oncology Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Randomized Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Christopher L Hallemeier; Peixin Zhang; Thomas M Pisansky; Gerald E Hanks; David G McGowan; Mack Roach; Kenneth L Zeitzer; Selim Y Firat; Siraj M Husain; David P D'Souza; Luis Souhami; Matthew B Parliament; Seth A Rosenthal; Himanshu R Lukka; Marvin Rotman; Eric M Horwitz; Edward F Miles; Rebecca Paulus; Howard M Sandler
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  External beam radiation therapy and abiraterone in men with localized prostate cancer: safety and effect on tissue androgens.

Authors:  Eunpi Cho; Elahe A Mostaghel; Kenneth J Russell; Jay J Liao; Mark A Konodi; Brenda F Kurland; Brett T Marck; Alvin M Matsumoto; Bruce L Dalkin; R Bruce Montgomery
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  [Radiotherapy in the treatment of advanced and recurrent prostate cancer].

Authors:  D Böhmer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 5.  Radiotherapy and Hormone Treatment in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Dirk Böhmer; Manfred Wirth; Kurt Miller; Volker Budach; Axel Heidenreich; Thomas Wiegel
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 5.594

6.  Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Low- and Low-Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: Is there a Dose Effect?

Authors:  Alan J Katz; Michael Santoro; Richard Ashley; Ferdinand Diblasio
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Prostate-specific antigen kinetics following hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy boost as post-external beam radiotherapy versus conventionally fractionated external beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jeong Hoon Phak; Hun Jung Kim; Woo Chul Kim
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2015-12-12

8.  Hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy in low- and intermediate-risk prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  Hun Jung Kim; Jeong Hoon Phak; Woo Chul Kim
Journal:  Radiat Oncol J       Date:  2016-06-17

9.  Stereotactic body radiation therapy for the primary treatment of localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Caspian Oliai; Rachelle Lanciano; Brian Sprandio; Jun Yang; John Lamond; Steven Arrigo; Michael Good; Michael Mooreville; Bruce Garber; Luther W Brady
Journal:  J Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-09-12

10.  Prostate-specific antigen kinetics after stereotactic body radiotherapy as monotherapy or boost after whole pelvic radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hun Jung Kim; Jung Hoon Phak; Woo Chul Kim
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2015-11-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.