OBJECTIVE: Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) is a tryptophan-catabolizing enzyme that induces tolerance to host immune surveillance within the tumor microenvironment. The present study aimed to investigate IDO expression and its prognostic significance in invasive cervical cancer. METHODS: Immunohistochemical expression of IDO in tumor tissues and its association with clinicopathological factors and survival were analyzed in 112 stage IB-IIB cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. RESULTS: IDO was diffusely expressed in tumor cells in 29 (26%) cases and focally expressed at the invasive front in 29 (26%) cases, while the other 54 (48%) cases were IDO-negative. IDO expression was positively correlated with clinical stage, lymph node metastasis, and lymph-vascular space invasion, but not with histological type. Patients with diffuse IDO expression had significantly reduced overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) compared to patients with no IDO expression. The 5-year OS/DFS rates for the IDO-negative, focally positive, and diffusely positive groups were 92.3%/84.9%, 89.5%/75.8%, and 65.5%/51.7%, respectively. When we analyzed patients with stage IB disease alone (n=67), the OS and DFS for the IDO-diffusely positive group were significantly lower than those for the IDO-negative group. In multivariate analysis, diffuse IDO expression was found to be an independent prognostic factor for impaired OS and DFS. CONCLUSIONS: Diffuse expression of IDO in the tumor obtained from Stage IB-IIB cervical cancer patients who underwent radical hysterectomy was correlated with an unfavorable clinical outcome. These findings suggest that IDO may be a novel post-operative prognostic indicator for stage IB-IIB cervical cancer. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
OBJECTIVE:Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) is a tryptophan-catabolizing enzyme that induces tolerance to host immune surveillance within the tumor microenvironment. The present study aimed to investigate IDO expression and its prognostic significance in invasive cervical cancer. METHODS: Immunohistochemical expression of IDO in tumor tissues and its association with clinicopathological factors and survival were analyzed in 112 stage IB-IIB cervical cancerpatients treated with radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. RESULTS:IDO was diffusely expressed in tumor cells in 29 (26%) cases and focally expressed at the invasive front in 29 (26%) cases, while the other 54 (48%) cases were IDO-negative. IDO expression was positively correlated with clinical stage, lymph node metastasis, and lymph-vascular space invasion, but not with histological type. Patients with diffuse IDO expression had significantly reduced overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) compared to patients with no IDO expression. The 5-year OS/DFS rates for the IDO-negative, focally positive, and diffusely positive groups were 92.3%/84.9%, 89.5%/75.8%, and 65.5%/51.7%, respectively. When we analyzed patients with stage IB disease alone (n=67), the OS and DFS for the IDO-diffusely positive group were significantly lower than those for the IDO-negative group. In multivariate analysis, diffuse IDO expression was found to be an independent prognostic factor for impaired OS and DFS. CONCLUSIONS: Diffuse expression of IDO in the tumor obtained from Stage IB-IIB cervical cancerpatients who underwent radical hysterectomy was correlated with an unfavorable clinical outcome. These findings suggest that IDO may be a novel post-operative prognostic indicator for stage IB-IIB cervical cancer. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Debbie M Ferns; Ido P Kema; Marrije R Buist; Hans W Nijman; Gemma G Kenter; Ekaterina S Jordanova Journal: Oncoimmunology Date: 2015-02-25 Impact factor: 8.110
Authors: Stephanie C Casey; Amedeo Amedei; Katia Aquilano; Asfar S Azmi; Fabian Benencia; Dipita Bhakta; Alan E Bilsland; Chandra S Boosani; Sophie Chen; Maria Rosa Ciriolo; Sarah Crawford; Hiromasa Fujii; Alexandros G Georgakilas; Gunjan Guha; Dorota Halicka; William G Helferich; Petr Heneberg; Kanya Honoki; W Nicol Keith; Sid P Kerkar; Sulma I Mohammed; Elena Niccolai; Somaira Nowsheen; H P Vasantha Rupasinghe; Abbas Samadi; Neetu Singh; Wamidh H Talib; Vasundara Venkateswaran; Richard L Whelan; Xujuan Yang; Dean W Felsher Journal: Semin Cancer Biol Date: 2015-04-10 Impact factor: 15.707
Authors: M Cavia-Saiz; P Muñiz Rodríguez; B Llorente Ayala; M García-González; M J Coma-Del Corral; C García Girón Journal: Mol Biol Rep Date: 2014-01-17 Impact factor: 2.316
Authors: Lijie Zhai; Erik Ladomersky; Kristen L Lauing; Meijing Wu; Matthew Genet; Galina Gritsina; Balázs Győrffy; Priscilla K Brastianos; David C Binder; Jeffrey A Sosman; Francis J Giles; Charles D James; Craig Horbinski; Roger Stupp; Derek A Wainwright Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-07-27 Impact factor: 12.531