Literature DB >> 20350677

Learning spinal manipulation skills: assessment of biomechanical parameters in a 5-year longitudinal study.

Martin Descarreaux1, Claude Dugas.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Teaching spinal manipulation (SM) is a fundamental aspect of chiropractic training. Recent works have identified various biomechanical variables as indicators of SM performance and learning. However, only data from cross-sectional studies are available, limiting conclusions regarding the persistence of SM performance over the years. Therefore, the main objective of this investigation was to quantify the evolution of biomechanical parameters of SM over a 5-year learning period.
METHODS: Thirty-three students enrolled in a chiropractic program participated in the present study. They were tested each year at the beginning of each fall semester by performing 10 SMs on an instrumented manikin while standing on a force plate. The procedure allowed us to measure various force-time parameters.
RESULTS: Overall, significant time effects were noted for most dependent variables. The results indicated rapid improvement in the peak force applied and the rate of force production during the first 2 years. Time to peak force decreased drastically during the first year, whereas preload forces reached satisfactory levels during the third year. When various force-time requirements of bimanual task components were met, learners significantly reduced trial-to-trial variability of SM peak and preload forces, indicating automaticity of performance. Although global coordination improved in all learning processes, it was only in the later phase that learners reached values approaching those of experts.
CONCLUSION: Overall, these results highlighted the importance of considering learning principles in the development of didactic strategies related to SM motor skills. Copyright 2010 National University of Health Sciences. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20350677     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2010.01.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther        ISSN: 0161-4754            Impact factor:   1.437


  20 in total

1.  Knowledge transfer of spinal manipulation skills by student-teachers: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Matthias Knobe; Malte Holschen; Saskia Catharina Mooij; Richard Martin Sellei; Ralf Münker; Pia Antony; Roman Pfeifer; Wolf Drescher; Hans-Christoph Pape
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Correlation of expertise with error detection skills of force application during spinal manipulation learning.

Authors:  Michel Loranger; Julien Treboz; Jean-Alexandre Boucher; François Nougarou; Claude Dugas; Martin Descarreaux
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2015-08-13

3.  Learning spinal manipulation: a comparison of two teaching models.

Authors:  Marie-Pierre Harvey; Shari Wynd; Lance Richardson; Claude Dugas; Martin Descarreaux
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2011

4.  A comparison of the academic outcome of chiropractic students on full-time and full-time equivalent chiropractic education routes.

Authors:  Adrian G W Hunnisett; Christina Cunliffe
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2020-10-01

5.  Effects of practice variability on spinal manipulation learning.

Authors:  Andrée-Anne Marchand; Laura Mendoza; Claude Dugas; Martin Descarreaux; Isabelle Pagé
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2017-01-25

6.  Training and certification of doctors of chiropractic in delivering manual cervical traction forces: Results of a longitudinal observational study.

Authors:  Maruti Ram Gudavalli; Robert D Vining; Stacie A Salsbury; Christine M Goertz
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2014-09-19

7.  Real-time force feedback during flexion-distraction procedure for low back pain: A pilot study.

Authors:  Maruti Ram Gudavalli; James M Cox
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2014-06

8.  Learning spinal manipulation: A best-evidence synthesis of teaching methods.

Authors:  Brynne E Stainsby; Michelle C S Clarke; Jade R Egonia
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2016-03-21

9.  Clinician proficiency in delivering manual treatment for neck pain within specified force ranges.

Authors:  Maruti Ram Gudavalli; Robert D Vining; Stacie A Salsbury; Lance G Corber; Cynthia R Long; Avinash G Patwardhan; Christine M Goertz
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 4.166

10.  Optimized prediction of contact force application during side-lying lumbar manipulation.

Authors:  Casey A Myers; Brian A Enebo; Bradley S Davidson
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.437

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.