Literature DB >> 20350578

Juvenile animal testing in drug development--is it useful?

Paul Baldrick1.   

Abstract

In pharmaceutical drug development, there has been increased interest in the need to perform juvenile animal studies to support the safety of use of new medicines in the pediatric population. Although such studies are not new, the increased interest has been "formalized" in recent regulatory guidelines. As a result, companies are now performing many more studies in juvenile animals, even when there is a lack of robust knowledge of cross-species functional and kinetic differences among juveniles that means extrapolation of any toxicology study finding to an immature human may not be easy or even relevant, especially if performed in the wrong species at the wrong time. It will be shown by presentation of some basic considerations needed in order to perform such testing, that juvenile animal studies are indeed feasible. However, it will also be highlighted that (based on available knowledge) there are currently not enough clear-cut examples to answer the question of whether juvenile animal toxicology studies to support pediatric development (by affecting the performance or design of a pediatric clinical trial or identifying a potential different-from-adult safety risk in clinical use) are truly useful or necessary. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20350578     DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  7 in total

1.  In vitro Phase I- and Phase II-Drug Metabolism in The Liver of Juvenile and Adult Göttingen Minipigs.

Authors:  Els Van Peer; Frank Jacobs; Jan Snoeys; Jos Van Houdt; Ils Pijpers; Christophe Casteleyn; Chris Van Ginneken; Steven Van Cruchten
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  A database of pediatric drug effects to evaluate ontogenic mechanisms from child growth and development.

Authors:  Nicholas P Giangreco; Nicholas P Tatonetti
Journal:  Med (N Y)       Date:  2022-06-24

3.  Assessment of juvenile pigs to serve as human pediatric surrogates for preclinical formulation pharmacokinetic testing.

Authors:  Wyatt J Roth; Candice B Kissinger; Robyn R McCain; Bruce R Cooper; Jeremy N Marchant-Forde; Rachel C Vreeman; Sophia Hannou; Gregory T Knipp
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 4.  The rights and wrongs of blood-brain barrier permeability studies: a walk through 100 years of history.

Authors:  Norman R Saunders; Jean-Jacques Dreifuss; Katarzyna M Dziegielewska; Pia A Johansson; Mark D Habgood; Kjeld Møllgård; Hans-Christian Bauer
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 5.  Navigating the Regulatory Landscape to Develop Pediatric Oncology Drugs: Expert Opinion Recommendations.

Authors:  Elly Barry; Darrin Beaupre; Eileen Blasi; Jaimie A Walsh; Scott L Weinrich; Daniel R Arenson; Ira A Jacobs
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 6.  No population left behind: Improving paediatric drug safety using informatics and systems biology.

Authors:  Nicholas P Giangreco; Jonathan E Elias; Nicholas P Tatonetti
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 3.716

7.  Evaluating risk detection methods to uncover ontogenic-mediated adverse drug effect mechanisms in children.

Authors:  Nicholas P Giangreco; Nicholas P Tatonetti
Journal:  BioData Min       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 2.522

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.