Literature DB >> 20350408

Clostridium difficile in ground meat, France.

Sylvie Bouttier, Marie-Claude Barc, Benjamin Felix, Sylvie Lambert, Anne Collignon, Frédéric Barbut.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20350408      PMCID: PMC3321948          DOI: 10.3201/eid1604.091138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor: Clostridium difficile is a toxigenic enteropathogen responsible for 15%–20% of antimicrobial drug–associated diarrhea and for almost all cases of pseudomembranous colitis. Two protein toxins (TcdA and TcdB) play a major role in the pathogenesis of infections. C. difficile is also recognized as a cause of disease in several animal species, which could be potential reservoirs (). In the past few years, the presence of C. difficile in raw diets for dogs and cats and in retail meat sold for human consumption has been reported in the United States and Canada at rates from 6% to 42% (–). To determine C. difficile contamination of meat in France, we evaluated 105 packages of ground beef (vacuum packed or not), 59 pork sausages, and 12 packages of feline raw diet meat purchased from 20 urban and suburban Paris retail stores and supermarkets during September 2007–July 2008. C. difficile spores or vegetative forms in samples were found as described by Rodriguez-Palacios et al. (4). Briefly, 5 g of each sample was cultured in 100 mL of prereduced brain–heart infusion (BHI) broth supplemented with cefoxitin (10 µg/mL), cycloserine (250 µg/mL), and taurocholate (0.1%). After the samples were incubated under anaerobic conditions at 37°C for 72 h, subculturing with and without alcohol shock for spore selection was performed. The BHI broth culture was treated with 2 mL of absolute ethanol (1:1 vol/vol) for 30 min and centrifuged at 3,800 × g for 10 min, and the pellet was resuspended in 200 µL of prereduced BHI broth. Serial dilutions of the BHI broth and the pellet were injected onto Columbia cysteine agar supplemented with cefoxitin-cycloserine, taurocholate, and 5% horse blood and incubated anaerobically for 48 h at 37°C. C. difficile colonies were identified classically, and susceptibilities to moxifloxacin, teicoplanin, vancomycin, metronidazole, linezolid, levofloxacin, telithromycin, erythromycin, and lincomycin were determined by the agar disk-diffusion methods described by the French Society for Microbiology (www.sfm.asso.fr). PCR amplifications of a species-specific internal fragment of the triose phosphate isomerase (tpi) gene, an internal fragment of the toxin B (tcdB) gene, and the 3′ region of the toxin A (tcdA) gene were performed as described by Lemee et al. (). Strains were characterized by toxinotyping according to Rupnik et al. () and PCR-ribotyping as described by Bidet et al. (). The detection threshold of the enrichment method was established by spiking known uninfected samples (ground beef, pork sausage, and feline raw diets) with vegetative cells and spores of C. difficile (VPI 10463 strain). For ground beef samples, the detection thresholds for vegetative forms and spores were 2 CFU/5 g and 4.5 CFU/5 g of meat, respectively. For pork sausages, the detection thresholds were 14 CFU/5 g and 38 CFU/5 g of sample after 72 h, for vegetative forms and spores, respectively. For feline raw diets, the detection threshold of spores was 2 CFU/5 g of sample. In addition, toxin B was detected in the culture supernatants by the cytotoxicity assay onto MRC-5 cells. Toxin detection showed 100% agreement with the culture method. C. difficile was not detected in pork sausages or in commercial feline raw diets. C. difficile was isolated from 2 (1.9%) of 105 ground beef, but only from those packages that were vacuum packed. The anaerobic atmosphere of vacuum packaging could facilitate the survival of C. difficile and the germination of spores. These 2 isolates were fully susceptible to moxifloxacin, teicoplanin, vancomycin, metronidazole, and linezolid but resistant to levofloxacin, telithromycin, erythromycin, and lincomycin. They harbored genes encoding for Tpi protein and for TcdA and TcdB. The 2 strains belonged to the toxinotype 0 and PCR-ribotype 012. Toxinotype 0 was already identified in meat samples in Canada (). PCR-ribotype 012 belongs to the 10 ribotypes most frequently isolated from humans (). The prevalence of C. difficile in ground meat in France is low compared with the prevalence reported by other countries. In Canada, Rodriguez-Palacios et al. () studied 60 beef samples and found the prevalence of C. difficile to be 20%. These same authors, by using a broader sampling scheme (214 meat samples), isolated C. difficile from 6% of the samples (). Also in Canada, Weese et al. () reported that 12% of ground beef and ground pork samples were contaminated. In the United States, C. difficile was isolated from 42% of meat samples (beef, pork, and turkey products) (). For a better understanding of the sources of C. difficile in France, it would be interesting to determine its prevalence in different animal fecal samples and the toxinotypes associated with animals. The low prevalence in retail meat in France could result from hazard analysis critical control point principles and microbiologic quality controls implemented throughout the food production chain, which help reduce the spread of C. difficile and minimize the risk for infection for the consumer.
  10 in total

1.  Comparison of PCR-ribotyping, arbitrarily primed PCR, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for typing Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  P Bidet; V Lalande; B Salauze; B Burghoffer; V Avesani; M Delmée; A Rossier; F Barbut; J C Petit
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Bacteriological evaluation of commercial canine and feline raw diets.

Authors:  J Scott Weese; Joyce Rousseau; L Arroyo
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.008

3.  Multiplex PCR targeting tpi (triose phosphate isomerase), tcdA (Toxin A), and tcdB (Toxin B) genes for toxigenic culture of Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Ludovic Lemee; Anne Dhalluin; Sabrina Testelin; Marie-Andre Mattrat; Karine Maillard; Jean-François Lemeland; Jean-Louis Pons
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Prospective study of Clostridium difficile infections in Europe with phenotypic and genotypic characterisation of the isolates.

Authors:  F Barbut; P Mastrantonio; M Delmée; J Brazier; E Kuijper; I Poxton
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 8.067

5.  A novel toxinotyping scheme and correlation of toxinotypes with serogroups of Clostridium difficile isolates.

Authors:  M Rupnik; V Avesani; M Janc; C von Eichel-Streiber; M Delmée
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Detection and enumeration of Clostridium difficile spores in retail beef and pork.

Authors:  J Scott Weese; Brent P Avery; J Rousseau; Richard J Reid-Smith
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Clostridium difficile in retail meat products, USA, 2007.

Authors:  J Glenn Songer; Hien T Trinh; George E Killgore; Angela D Thompson; L Clifford McDonald; Brandi M Limbago
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 6.883

8.  Clostridium difficile in retail ground meat, Canada.

Authors:  Alexander Rodriguez-Palacios; Henry R Staempfli; Todd Duffield; J Scott Weese
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.883

9.  Possible seasonality of Clostridium difficile in retail meat, Canada.

Authors:  Alexander Rodriguez-Palacios; Richard J Reid-Smith; Henry R Staempfli; Danielle Daignault; Nicol Janecko; Brent P Avery; Hayley Martin; Angela D Thomspon; L Clifford McDonald; Brandi Limbago; J Scott Weese
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  Toxinotype V Clostridium difficile in humans and food animals.

Authors:  Michael A Jhung; Angela D Thompson; George E Killgore; Walter E Zukowski; Glenn Songer; Michael Warny; Stuart Johnson; Dale N Gerding; L Clifford McDonald; Brandi M Limbago
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 6.883

  10 in total
  10 in total

Review 1.  Fidaxomicin in Clostridium difficile infection: latest evidence and clinical guidance.

Authors:  Kathleen Mullane
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.091

Review 2.  Understanding Clostridium difficile Colonization.

Authors:  Monique J T Crobach; Jonathan J Vernon; Vivian G Loo; Ling Yuan Kong; Séverine Péchiné; Mark H Wilcox; Ed J Kuijper
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Molecular Characterization of Clostridium difficile Isolates from Human Subjects and the Environment.

Authors:  Tian-tian Tian; Jian-hong Zhao; Jing Yang; Cui-xin Qiang; Zhi-rong Li; Jing Chen; Kai-yue Xu; Qing-qing Ciu; Ru-xin Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Prevalence of Clostridium difficile and its toxigenic genotype in beef samples in west of Iran.

Authors:  Malihe Kheradmand; Somayeh Jalilian; Amirhooshang Alvandi; Ramin Abiri
Journal:  Iran J Microbiol       Date:  2017-06

5.  Prevalence of Clostridium difficile in raw beef, cow, sheep, goat, camel and buffalo meat in Iran.

Authors:  Ebrahim Rahimi; Mohammad Jalali; J Scott Weese
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Prevalence and Characterization of Clostridium difficile in Beef and Mutton Meats of Isfahan Region, Iran.

Authors:  Zahra Esfandiari; Mohammad Jalali; Hamid Ezzatpanah; J Scott Weese; Mohammad Chamani
Journal:  Jundishapur J Microbiol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 0.747

Review 7.  Epidemiology and Risk Factors for Community-Associated Clostridium difficile Infection: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Lauren E Bloomfield; Thomas V Riley
Journal:  Infect Dis Ther       Date:  2016-07-01

8.  Detection, Characterization and Antibiotic Susceptibility of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile in Meat Products.

Authors:  Karlo Muratoglu; Esra Akkaya; Hamparsun Hampikyan; Enver Baris Bingol; Omer Cetin; Hilal Colak
Journal:  Food Sci Anim Resour       Date:  2020-07-01

9.  Peptidoglycan analysis reveals that synergistic deacetylase activity in vegetative Clostridium difficile impacts the host response.

Authors:  Héloise Coullon; Aline Rifflet; Richard Wheeler; Claire Janoir; Ivo G Boneca; Thomas Candela
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Genotyping and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Clostridium perfringens and Clostridioides difficile in Camel Minced Meat.

Authors:  Mahmoud Fayez; Waleed R El-Ghareeb; Ahmed Elmoslemany; Saleem J Alsunaini; Mohamed Alkafafy; Othman M Alzahrani; Samy F Mahmoud; Ibrahim Elsohaby
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2021-12-19
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.