Literature DB >> 20350123

Pharmacogenomics: the importance of accurate phenotypes.

David Gurwitz1, Munir Pirmohamed.   

Abstract

Lack of knowledge regarding genotype-phenotype correlations is often cited as the major barrier delaying the uptake of pharmacogenomics into routine medical practice. When we look forward to genome-wide association studies as one of the most promising tools for overcoming the pharmacogenomics knowledge barrier, we must keep in mind that having large patient cohorts may not help improve our understanding of alleles implicated in drug-response phenotypes, unless we ensure that such phenotypes are precise and pertinent. It may be wiser, and far more cost effective, to invest scarce research funding in accurate patient drug-response phenotyping than to genotype (or fully sequence) hundreds to thousands of study participants. Biobanks created with personalized medicine research in mind should, when possible, have access to donors' clinical data, including detailed disease- and drug-response phenotypes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20350123     DOI: 10.2217/pgs.10.41

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacogenomics        ISSN: 1462-2416            Impact factor:   2.533


  10 in total

1.  Importance of multi-modal approaches to effectively identify cataract cases from electronic health records.

Authors:  Peggy L Peissig; Luke V Rasmussen; Richard L Berg; James G Linneman; Catherine A McCarty; Carol Waudby; Lin Chen; Joshua C Denny; Russell A Wilke; Jyotishman Pathak; David Carrell; Abel N Kho; Justin B Starren
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Relational machine learning for electronic health record-driven phenotyping.

Authors:  Peggy L Peissig; Vitor Santos Costa; Michael D Caldwell; Carla Rottscheit; Richard L Berg; Eneida A Mendonca; David Page
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 3.  [Treat to target and personalized medicine (precision medicine)].

Authors:  J Detert; G R Burmester
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.372

4.  Search for genetic determinants of sulfonylurea efficacy in type 2 diabetic patients from China.

Authors:  Qian Ren; Xueyao Han; Yong Tang; Xiuying Zhang; Xiantong Zou; Xiaoling Cai; Simin Zhang; Lihua Zhang; Hechao Li; Linong Ji
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 5.  Personalized cardiovascular medicine: concepts and methodological considerations.

Authors:  Henry Völzke; Carsten O Schmidt; Sebastian E Baumeister; Till Ittermann; Glenn Fung; Janina Krafczyk-Korth; Wolfgang Hoffmann; Matthias Schwab; Henriette E Meyer zu Schwabedissen; Marcus Dörr; Stephan B Felix; Wolfgang Lieb; Heyo K Kroemer
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 32.419

6.  Extracting research-quality phenotypes from electronic health records to support precision medicine.

Authors:  Wei-Qi Wei; Joshua C Denny
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 11.117

Review 7.  A review of approaches to identifying patient phenotype cohorts using electronic health records.

Authors:  Chaitanya Shivade; Preethi Raghavan; Eric Fosler-Lussier; Peter J Embi; Noemie Elhadad; Stephen B Johnson; Albert M Lai
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Assessment of pharmacogenetic tests: presenting measures of clinical validity and potential population impact in association studies.

Authors:  E C M Tonk; D Gurwitz; A-H Maitland-van der Zee; A C J W Janssens
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 3.550

Review 9.  Big Data Analytics for Genomic Medicine.

Authors:  Karen Y He; Dongliang Ge; Max M He
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 10.  Peripheral transcriptomic biomarkers for early detection of sporadic Alzheimer disease?

Authors:  Adva Hadar; David Gurwitz
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 5.986

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.