Literature DB >> 20350042

The effects of visual magnification and physical movement scale on the manipulation of a tool with indirect vision.

Michael Bohan1, Daniel S McConnell, Alex Chaparro, Shelby G Thompson.   

Abstract

Modern tools often separate the visual and physical aspects of operation, requiring users to manipulate an instrument while viewing the results indirectly on a display. This can pose usability challenges particularly in applications, such as laparoscopic surgery, that require a high degree of movement precision. Magnification used to augment the view and, theoretically, enable finer movements, may introduce other visual-motor disruptions due to the apparent speed of the visual motion on screen (i.e., motion scaling). In this research, we sought to better understand the effects of visual magnification on human movement performance and control in operating a tool via indirect vision. Ten adult participants manipulated a computer mouse to direct a pointer to targets on a display. Results (Experiment 1) showed that, despite increased motion scaling, magnification of the view on screen enabled higher precision control of the mouse pointer. However, the relative effectiveness of visual magnification ultimately depended on the scale of the physical movement, and more specifically the precision limits of the whole-hand grip afforded by the mouse. When the physical scale of the hand/mouse movement was reduced (Experiment 2), fine-precision control began to reach its limits, even at full magnification. The role of magnification can thus be understood as "amplifying" the particular skill level afforded by the effecting limb. These findings suggest a fruitful area for future research is the optimization of hand-control interfaces of tools to maximize movement precision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20350042     DOI: 10.1037/a0018501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl        ISSN: 1076-898X


  4 in total

1.  Optimizing the control of high-ID movements: rethinking the power of the visual display.

Authors:  Jason B Boyle; Stefan Panzer; Chaoyi Wang; Deanna Kennedy; Charles H Shea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Micro-movements of varying difficulties: wrist and arm movements.

Authors:  Jason B Boyle; Charles H Shea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Magnification effect on fine motor skills of dental students.

Authors:  Danielle Wajngarten; Júlia Margato Pazos; Vinícius Perassoli Menegazzo; Juliana Pimentel Duarte Novo; Patrícia Petromilli Nordi Sasso Garcia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The investigation of laparoscopic instrument movement control and learning effect.

Authors:  Chiuhsiang Joe Lin; Hung-Jen Chen
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.411

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.