Literature DB >> 20349751

Practical use of airway pressure release ventilation for severe ARDS--a preliminary report in comparison with a conventional ventilatory support.

Liangji Liu1, Koichi Tanigawa, Kohei Ota, Tomoko Tamura, Satoshi Yamaga, Yoshiko Kida, Tomohiro Kondo, Makoto Ishida, Tadatsugu Otani, Takuma Sadamori, Ryu Tsumura, Taku Takeda, Yasumasa Iwasaki, Nobuyuki Hirohashi.   

Abstract

Airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) is a ventilatory mode that allows unsupported spontaneous breathing at any phase of the ventilatory cycle with high mean airway pressures. We hypothesized that use of APRV might produce potential beneficial effects on oxygenation, reducing mortality in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in comparison with synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV) as a conventional mode of ventilation. We retrospectively reviewed data of 58 patients with severe ARDS (the ratios of partial arterial oxygen tension to fraction of inspired oxygen, PaO2/F(I)O2 ratio <150). The patients' data were divided into two groups: SIMV-group and APRV-group. Patients' backgrounds, oxygenation on day 0, 1, 3, 5 and 7 following initiation of each mode, vasopressor dependence, duration of ventilation, duration of ICU stay, and mortality in ICU were analyzed. PaO2/F(I)O2 ratios were statistically higher in the APRV-group (APRV vs. SIMV on day 1, 3, 5, 7: 201.6 +/- 76 vs.150 +/- 59.1, 256.7 +/- 71.5 vs.182.1 +/- 65.4, 268.8 +/- 73.3 vs. 204.6 +/- 72.8, and 263 +/- 74.5 vs. 204.1 +/- 67.1, respectively, p<0.05). Vasopressors were less used (p=0.018), and mortality in ICU tended to be lower in the APRV group (31%) than in the SIMV group (59%) (p=0.050). Use of APRV in patients with severe ARDS appears to be associated with improvements in oxygenation, and a trend toward lower mortality in ICU. No significant adverse effects were observed. Prospective controlled studies are required to confirm the benefits of this ventilatory mode in comparison with conventional methods for severe ARDS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20349751

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hiroshima J Med Sci        ISSN: 0018-2052


  5 in total

Review 1.  Airway Pressure Release Ventilation: A Review of the Evidence, Theoretical Benefits, and Alternative Titration Strategies.

Authors:  Andrew S Fredericks; Matthew P Bunker; Louise A Gliga; Callie G Ebeling; Jenny Rb Ringqvist; Hooman Heravi; James Manley; Jason Valladares; Bryan T Romito
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Circ Respir Pulm Med       Date:  2020-02-05

Review 2.  The 30-year evolution of airway pressure release ventilation (APRV).

Authors:  Sumeet V Jain; Michaela Kollisch-Singule; Benjamin Sadowitz; Luke Dombert; Josh Satalin; Penny Andrews; Louis A Gatto; Gary F Nieman; Nader M Habashi
Journal:  Intensive Care Med Exp       Date:  2016-05-20

3.  Randomized Feasibility Trial of a Low Tidal Volume-Airway Pressure Release Ventilation Protocol Compared With Traditional Airway Pressure Release Ventilation and Volume Control Ventilation Protocols.

Authors:  Eliotte L Hirshberg; Michael J Lanspa; Juhee Peterson; Lori Carpenter; Emily L Wilson; Samuel M Brown; Nathan C Dean; James Orme; Colin K Grissom
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  Airway Pressure Release Ventilation as a Rescue Therapy in Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Authors:  Nazik Yener; Muhammed Üdürgücü
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 1.967

5.  The safety and efficacy of airway pressure release ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xuri Sun; Yuqi Liu; Neng Li; Deyuan You; Yanping Zhao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.889

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.