Literature DB >> 20349498

Prospective validation of a comprehensive in silico hERG model and its applications to commercial compound and drug databases.

Munikumar R Doddareddy1, Elisabeth C Klaasse, Adriaan P Ijzerman, Andreas Bender.   

Abstract

Ligand-based in silico hERG models were generated for 2 644 compounds using linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and support vector machines (SVM). As a result, the dataset used for the model generation is the largest publicly available (see Supporting Information). Extended connectivity fingerprints (ECFPs) and functional class fingerprints (FCFPs) were used to describe chemical space. All models showed area under curve (AUC) values ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 in a fivefold cross-validation, indicating high model consistency. Models correctly predicted 80 % of an additional, external test set; Y-scrambling was also performed to rule out chance correlation. Additionally models based on patch clamp data and radioligand binding data were generated separately to analyze their predictive ability when compared to combined models. To experimentally validate the models, 50 of the predicted hERG blockers from the Chembridge database and ten of the predicted non-hERG blockers from an in-house compound library were selected for biological evaluation. Out of those 50 predicted hERG blockers, tested at a concentration of 10 microM, 18 compounds showed more than 50 % displacement of [(3)H]astemizole binding to cell membranes expressing the hERG channel. K(i) values of four of the selected binders were determined to be in the micromolar and high nanomolar range (K(i) (VH01)=2.0 microM, K(i) (VH06)=0.15 microM, K(i) (VH19)=1.1 microM and K(i) (VH47)=18 microM). Of these four compounds, VH01 and VH47 showed also a second, even higher affinity binding site with K(i) values of 7.4 nM and 36 nM, respectively. In the case of non-hERG blockers, all ten compounds tested were found to be inactive, showing less than 50 % displacement of [(3)H]astemizole binding at 10 microM. These experimentally validated models were then used to virtually screen commercial compound databases to evaluate whether they contain hERG blockers. 109 784 (23 %) of Chembridge, 133 175 (38 %) of Chemdiv, 111 737 (31 %) of Asinex and 11 116 (18 %) of the Maybridge database were predicted to be hERG blockers by at least two of the models, a prediction which could, for example, be used as a pre-filtering tool for compounds with potential hERG liabilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20349498     DOI: 10.1002/cmdc.201000024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ChemMedChem        ISSN: 1860-7179            Impact factor:   3.466


  16 in total

1.  Investigation of miscellaneous hERG inhibition in large diverse compound collection using automated patch-clamp assay.

Authors:  Hai-bo Yu; Bei-yan Zou; Xiao-liang Wang; Min Li
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 6.150

2.  Compilation and physicochemical classification analysis of a diverse hERG inhibition database.

Authors:  Remigijus Didziapetris; Kiril Lanevskij
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Deep Learning-Based Prediction of Drug-Induced Cardiotoxicity.

Authors:  Chuipu Cai; Pengfei Guo; Yadi Zhou; Jingwei Zhou; Qi Wang; Fengxue Zhang; Jiansong Fang; Feixiong Cheng
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  Novel Bayesian classification models for predicting compounds blocking hERG potassium channels.

Authors:  Li-li Liu; Jing Lu; Yin Lu; Ming-yue Zheng; Xiao-min Luo; Wei-liang Zhu; Hua-liang Jiang; Kai-xian Chen
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 6.150

5.  In silico prediction of hERG potassium channel blockage by chemical category approaches.

Authors:  Chen Zhang; Yuan Zhou; Shikai Gu; Zengrui Wu; Wenjie Wu; Changming Liu; Kaidong Wang; Guixia Liu; Weihua Li; Philip W Lee; Yun Tang
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.524

6.  Performance of Machine Learning Algorithms for Qualitative and Quantitative Prediction Drug Blockade of hERG1 channel.

Authors:  Soren Wacker; Sergei Yu Noskov
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2017-05-13

7.  Tuning HERG out: antitarget QSAR models for drug development.

Authors:  Rodolpho C Braga; Vinicius M Alves; Meryck F B Silva; Eugene Muratov; Denis Fourches; Alexander Tropsha; Carolina H Andrade
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 8.  Machine Learning in Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology.

Authors:  Natalia A Trayanova; Dan M Popescu; Julie K Shade
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 17.367

9.  Facing small and biased data dilemma in drug discovery with enhanced federated learning approaches.

Authors:  Zhaoping Xiong; Ziqiang Cheng; Xinyuan Lin; Chi Xu; Xiaohong Liu; Dingyan Wang; Xiaomin Luo; Yong Zhang; Hualiang Jiang; Nan Qiao; Mingyue Zheng
Journal:  Sci China Life Sci       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 6.038

10.  Global analysis reveals families of chemical motifs enriched for HERG inhibitors.

Authors:  Fang Du; Joseph J Babcock; Haibo Yu; Beiyan Zou; Min Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.