| Literature DB >> 20349230 |
Jeroen Dudink1, Jan Buijs, Paul Govaert, Arjen L van Zwol, Nikk Conneman, Johannes B van Goudoever, Maarten Lequin.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many intervention studies in preterm infants aim to improve neurodevelopmental outcome, but short-term proxy outcome measurements are lacking. Cortical plate and subplate development could be such a marker.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20349230 PMCID: PMC2895885 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-010-1638-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pediatr Radiol ISSN: 0301-0449
Fig. 1Top image shows ROI placement (row of single voxels) in both frontal (a) and temporal (b) regions. The image below is a schematic diagram that shows the same ROI placement
Fig. 2Different MRI scan sequences of the same infant at 30 weeks GA. T1-W (a), T2-W image (b) and b0 image (c) show low signal intensity (SI) of the CP and a ROI placed in area of the subplate. ADC map (d) shows low (dark blue) ADC values of the cortex (arrow) and intermediate ADC values of the subplate (arrowhead). Colour map (e) (red representing right–left, green representing anteroposterior and blue representing superoinferior anatomical directions) and FA map (f), show high FA values of the cortex (arrow) and low FA values (blue) of the subplate zone (arrowhead)
Mean FA and ADC values in the frontal and temporal subplate
| Frontal subplate mean (SD) | Temporal subplate mean (SD) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Right | Left | Right | Left | |
| Single-voxel ROI | ||||
| FA | 0.069 (0.02) | 0.061 (0.02) | 0.08 (0.02) | 0.075 (0.02) |
| ADC × 10−3 mm2/s | 1.539 (0.14) | 1.519 (0.13) | 1.593 (0.14) | 1.609 (0.16) |
| 16-voxel ROI | ||||
| FA | 0.09 (0.03) | 0.08 (0.03) | 0.103 (0.02) | 0.09 (0.02) |
| ADC × 10−3 mm2/s | 1.509 (0.16) | 1.52 (0.17) | 1.509 (0.09) | 1.527 (0.12) |
Fig. 3FA and ADC of single-voxel ROIs
Fig. 4FA and ADC of ROIs of standard 16-pixel size