Literature DB >> 20349172

[Treatment of lateral humeral condyle fractures in children].

Nawid Ayubi1, Johannes M Mayr, Sergio Sesia, Rainer Kubiak.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Surgical treatment of lateral humeral condyle fractures with reduction and retention in order to prevent lasting malalignment, pseudarthrosis, and joint instability. INDICATIONS: Absolute: fractures with a complete dislocation or those in which plaster-free control X-ray on day 4 shows a gap of > 2 mm. Relative: complete fractures of the lateral humeral condyle which demonstrate a dislocation < or = 2 mm on follow-up. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Incomplete, so-called hanging fractures of the lateral humeral condyle without notable secondary dislocation on follow-up. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Open reduction of the lateral humeral condyle via a lateral approach to the elbow joint. In smaller children (< 5 years of age) fixation with Kirschner wires. In older children (> or = 5 years of age) or in cases requiring compression radial screw fixation is recommended. In all cases, suture repair of the periosteum is advisable. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Long upper-arm plaster cast until wound healing is achieved. Subsequently, upper-arm plaster cast for 3-4 weeks postoperatively. Implants are removed following consolidation (confirmed by X-ray) after approximately 2-3 months. Routine physiotherapy is normally not required.
RESULTS: From January 1, 1999 to December 31, 2006, 85 children with a median age of 6.1 years had lateral condyle fracture of the humerus treated. 47 patients underwent surgery. Of these, 31 were treated with a combination of screw and Kirschner wire fixation, 13 with a single screw, and in three cases, the fracture was fixed with Kirschner wires only. After a median of 8.6 weeks (range, 5.0-17.1 weeks), implants were removed. Median follow-up time was 6 months (range, 2-50 months). There were no late complications in this series (e.g., lack of consolidation, pseudarthrosis). In five cases, hyposensitivity of the skin above the proximal aspect of the radial bone was noted postoperatively. This problem was solved in all instances within the following 6 months. A telephone survey with a response rate of 87% (74 patients) was undertaken in September 2007. Three children noted a minimal deficiency in strength of the injured arm in comparison to the contralateral extremity. One of these children additionally stated a minor flexion deficit of the elbow already present at the last follow-up in the outpatient clinic, which showed no progress. None of the patients had to be referred back to the outpatient clinic because of persistent problems and/or unacceptable results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20349172     DOI: 10.1007/s00064-010-3006-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol        ISSN: 0934-6694            Impact factor:   1.154


  21 in total

Review 1.  [Operative procedures for intraarticular distal humerus fractures in children and adolescents].

Authors:  Martin J Kiderlen; Wolfgang Schlickewei
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2008 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 1.154

2.  Prediction of the stability of minimally displaced fractures of the lateral humeral condyle.

Authors:  S Thönell; W Mortensson; B Thomasson
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1988 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.990

3.  Children's fractures: principles and management.

Authors:  M Rang; G H Thompson
Journal:  Reconstr Surg Traumatol       Date:  1979

Review 4.  Observations concerning fractures of the lateral humeral condyle in children.

Authors:  R Jakob; J V Fowles; M Rang; M T Kassab
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1975-11

5.  Sonographic differentiation of stable and unstable lateral condyle fractures of the humerus in children.

Authors:  A K Vocke-Hell; A Schmid
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  Fractures of the lateral humeral condyle in children.

Authors:  A Rutherford
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Elbow fractures in children. An epidemiological analysis of 589 cases.

Authors:  L A Landin; L G Danielsson
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1986-08

8.  Distal humeral physeal injuries in child abuse: MR imaging and ultrasonography findings.

Authors:  K Nimkin; P K Kleinman; S Teeger; M R Spevak
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1995

9.  [Fracture of condylus radialis humeri during skeletal growth (author's transl)].

Authors:  L von Laer
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1981

10.  Results of operative treatment for ulnar neuropathy in patients with a history of fracture of the lateral part of the humeral condyle in childhood.

Authors:  Marta Tarczyńska; Robert Kołodziej; Jacek Gagała
Journal:  Ortop Traumatol Rehabil       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb
View more
  4 in total

1.  Open Vs. Closed Reduction in Type 2 Lateral Condyle Fractures.

Authors:  Kirollos Gendi; Andrew Livermore; Jason Browne; Maxwell Machurick; Matthew A Halanski; Kenneth J Noonan
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2019

2.  Comparison of Kirschner wires and AO cannulated screw internal fixation for displaced lateral humeral condyle fracture in children.

Authors:  Wen Chao Li; Rui Jiang Xu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Buried or unburied K-wires for lateral condyle elbow fractures.

Authors:  L McGonagle; S Elamin; D M Wright
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Management of Neglected Lateral Condyle Fracture of Humerus: A Comparison between Two Modalities of Fixation.

Authors:  Rahul Ranjan; Abhinav Sinha; Naiyer Asif; Syed Ifthekar; Ashish Kumar; Suresh Chand
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2018 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.251

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.