Literature DB >> 20349167

[Treatment of femoroacetabular impingement using a minimally invasive anterior approach].

Bernd Fink1, Pavol Sebena.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Treatment of femoracetabular impingement to prevent or delay the development of secondary osteoarthritis of the hip. Improvement of the mechanical limitation of the range of motion of the hip joint. Pain-free movement of the hip. INDICATIONS: Femoroacetabular impingement including a cam impingement, a pincer impingement, as well as mixtures of both types. Osteoarthritis of the hip joint grades 1-3 according to Kellgren induced by a femoroacetabular impingement. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Pincer impingement with the necessity of an osteotomy in acetabula malaligned in retroversion. Severe osteoarthritis grade 4 according to Kellgren. Hip infection. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Supine position of the patient. Longitudinal incision of 5-6 cm in line with the medial border of the anterior superior iliac spine at the level of the greater trochanter, two thirds cranially and one third distally of the tip of greater trochanter. Minimally invasive anterior approach in a modified technique of the Smith-Petersen approach with cutting of the fascia and preservation of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve running between the two layers of the fascia. Blind preparation between the sartorius muscle and the tensor fasciae latae muscle. Preparation and T-shaped opening of the joint capsule in the direction of the capsule fibers and the anterior iliofemoral ligament. Removal of additional bone mostly in the ventral area of the femoral neck with angled and straight chisels. Using different positions of the leg helps to reach the more medial and lateral areas of the femoral neck. A trimming of the acetabulum with or without refixation of the labrum in the anterior and anterocranial acetabular rim is also possible. Documentation using fluoroscopy. Wound closure. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Prophylaxis of deep venous thrombosis. Early functional mobilization with unlimited range of motion of the hip joint. The amount of weight bearing is influenced by the amount of bone resection during trimming. In most cases, full weight bearing is possible. In cases of extensive bone resection (more than one fourth of the femoral neck diameter), gradual increase of weight bearing over 6 weeks.
RESULTS: After a follow-up of 15.5 +/- 6.8 months, 65 patients (20 female, 45 male; 70 hip joints) aged 40.2 +/- 11.3 years showed an improvement of the Oxford Hip Score from 34.3 +/- 9.8 points preoperatively to 16.3 +/- 11.0 points and of the WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities) Score from 60.8 +/- 23.1 points to 84.0 +/- 15.1 points at the latest follow-up examination. The impingement test was negative in all cases. In twelve cases, a temporary hypesthesia of the cranial innervation area of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve was reported.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20349167     DOI: 10.1007/s00064-010-3002-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol        ISSN: 0934-6694            Impact factor:   1.154


  17 in total

1.  Surgical dislocation of the adult hip a technique with full access to the femoral head and acetabulum without the risk of avascular necrosis.

Authors:  R Ganz; T J Gill; E Gautier; K Ganz; N Krügel; U Berlemann
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-11

Review 2.  [Hip arthroscopy. Minimal invasive diagnosis and therapy of the diseased or injured hip joint].

Authors:  M Dienst; D Kohn
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis.

Authors:  J H KELLGREN; J S LAWRENCE
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1957-12       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  Arthroscopic treatment of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement: preliminary report at 2 years minimum follow-up.

Authors:  Victor M Ilizaliturri; Liliana Orozco-Rodriguez; Eduardo Acosta-Rodríguez; Javier Camacho-Galindo
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 5.  [Arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement. Technique and results].

Authors:  M Dienst; D Kohn
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Approach to and exposure of the hip joint for mold arthroplasty.

Authors:  M N SMITH-PETERSEN
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1949-01       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Treatment of femoro-acetabular impingement: preliminary results of labral refixation.

Authors:  Norman Espinosa; Dominique A Rothenfluh; Martin Beck; Reinhold Ganz; Michael Leunig
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Construct validity of a 12-item WOMAC for assessment of femoro-acetabular impingement and osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  D A Rothenfluh; D Reedwisch; U Müller; R Ganz; A Tennant; M Leunig
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 6.576

9.  Hip damage occurs at the zone of femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  M Tannast; D Goricki; M Beck; S B Murphy; K A Siebenrock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  The Oxford hip score: the patient's perspective.

Authors:  Vikki Wylde; Ian D Learmonth; Victoria J Cavendish
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2005-10-31       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  2 in total

1.  [Femoroacetabular impingement: minimally invasive hip surgery].

Authors:  E Sendtner; R Winkler; J Grifka
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Outcomes After Management of Subspine and Femoroacetabular Impingement Using a Direct Anterior Mini-Open Approach.

Authors:  Liu-Yang Xu; Kang-Ming Chen; Jian-Ping Peng; Jun-Feng Zhu; Chao Shen; Xiao-Dong Chen
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-12-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.