Dosimetric evaluation of inspiration and expiration breath-hold for intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning of non-small cell lung cancer.

The purpose of this study was to compare target coverage and lung tissue sparing between inspiration and expiration breath-hold intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In a prospective study, seven NSCLC patients gave written consent to undergo both moderate deep inspiration and end-expiration breath-hold computed tomography (CT), which were used to generate five-field IMRT plans. Dose was calculated with a scatter and an inhomogeneity correction algorithm. The percentage of the planning target volume (PTV) receiving 90% of the prescription dose (PTV(90)), the volume of total lung receiving >or=10 Gy (V(10)) and >or=20 Gy (V(20)) and the mean lung dose (MLD) were compared by the Student's paired t-test. Compared with the expiration plans, the mean +/- SD reductions for V(10), V(20) and MLD on the inspiration plans were 4.0 +/- 3.7% (p = 0.031), 2.5 +/- 2.3% (p = 0.028) and 1.1 +/- 0.7 Gy (p = 0.007), respectively. Conversely, a mean difference of 1.1 +/- 1.1% (p = 0.044) in PTV(90) was demonstrated in favour of expiration. When using IMRT, inspiration breath-hold can reduce the dose to normal lung tissue while expiration breath-hold can improve the target coverage. The improved lung sparing at inspiration may outweigh the modest improvements in target coverage at expiration.