Literature DB >> 20348282

Footwear traction and lower extremity joint loading.

John W Wannop1, Jay T Worobets, Darren J Stefanyshyn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Traction is influenced by the sole architecture and playing surface, with increases in traction potentially leading to injury. The mechanism as to how or why increased traction could lead to injury remains unknown.
PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to determine how shoes of different sole designs and traction influence knee and ankle joint moments. STUDY
DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study.
METHODS: Traction testing was performed on 2 shoes of varying sole designs (tread vs smooth) using a robotic testing machine. All testing was conducted on a 60-cm x 90-cm piece of sample track surface. Kinematic and kinetic data were then collected on 13 recreational athletes performing running V-cuts in the 2 different shoe conditions. Five trials per condition were collected with reflective markers placed on the right shank and shoe of each participant. Kinematic and kinetic data were collected using an 8-high-speed camera system and force plate.
RESULTS: The coefficient of translational traction and the peak moment of rotation were both significantly higher in the tread shoe compared with the smooth shoe (1.00 vs 0.87 and 23.87 N.m vs 16.12 N.m, respectively). The high-traction shoe had significantly higher peak ankle external rotation moments (89.58 N.m vs 80.17 N.m), peak knee external rotation moments (36.23 N.m vs 32.02 N.m), peak knee adduction moments (224.0 N.m vs 186.8 N.m), and knee adduction angular impulse (2.10 Nms vs 1.83 Nms) compared with the low-traction shoe.
CONCLUSION: Increased shoe traction significantly increased ankle and knee joint moments during a V-cut. Despite the significant difference in traction, no difference in performance was observed. These changes could have an effect on ankle and knee joint injury. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Shoes with decreased traction could be used in sports to reduce the joint moments in the knee and ankle and potentially reduce injury without a loss in performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20348282     DOI: 10.1177/0363546509359065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  2 in total

Review 1.  The Athletic Shoe in Football.

Authors:  James Jastifer; Richard Kent; Jeff Crandall; Chris Sherwood; David Lessley; Kirk A McCullough; Michael J Coughlin; Robert B Anderson
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.843

2.  Does the Spraino low-friction shoe patch prevent lateral ankle sprain injury in indoor sports? A pilot randomised controlled trial with 510 participants with previous ankle injuries.

Authors:  Filip Gertz Lysdal; Thomas Bandholm; Janne Schurmann Tolstrup; Mikkel Bek Clausen; Stephanie Mann; Pelle Baggesgaard Petersen; Thor Buch Grønlykke; Uwe G Kersting; Eamonn Delahunt; Kristian Thorborg
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 13.800

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.