Literature DB >> 20348164

Dentofacial effects of a modified tandem traction bow appliance.

Zeynep Atalay1, Tuba Tortop.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the dentofacial effects of a modified tandem traction bow appliance (modified TTBA) in skeletal Class III subjects, and the effect of age on treatment response. The material consisted of the pre-treatment/pre-observation and post-treatment/post-observation lateral cephalograms and hand-wrist films of 45 children with skeletal and dental Class III malocclusions. Thirty patients were treated with a modified TTBA. Two treatment groups of 15 patients each were formed: an early (nine girls, six boys; mean skeletal age: 8.18 ± 0.50 years) and a late treatment (5 girls, 10 boys; mean skeletal age: 11.75 ± 1.00 years) group. The remaining 15 children (5 girls, 10 boys; mean skeletal age: 7.90 ± 0.62 years) were observed without treatment for 8 months and served as a control for the early treatment group. Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney U-tests were used for statistical analysis. Significant forward maxillary movement was determined in both treatment groups (P < 0.01) while the decrease in SNB was significantly greater in the early treatment group compared with the control (P < 0.01). Upper molar tipping and sagittal displacement of point A (point A-T, N(⊥)FH-A) was found to be significantly greater in the late treatment group compared with the early treatment group (P < 0.05). In both treatment groups, dental and skeletal correction of the Class III malocclusion was achieved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20348164     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjp153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  5 in total

1.  Do we get better outcomes from early treatment of Class III discrepancies?

Authors:  Andrew T DiBiase; Jadbinder Seehra; Spyridon N Papageorgiou; Martyn T Cobourne
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 2.727

Review 2.  Developing Class III malocclusions: challenges and solutions.

Authors:  Edlira Zere; Prabhat Kumar Chaudhari; Jitendra Sharan; Kunaal Dhingra; Nitesh Tiwari
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2018-06-22

3.  Modified tandem traction bow appliance compared with facemask therapy in treating Class III malocclusions.

Authors:  Tuba Tortop; Emine Kaygisiz; Deniz Gencer; Sema Yuksel; Zeynep Atalay
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 4.  Bone- and dentoalveolar-anchored dentofacial orthopedics for Class III malocclusion: new approaches, similar objectives? : a systematic review.

Authors:  Marta Morales-Fernández; Alejandro Iglesias-Linares; Rosa Maria Yañez-Vico; Asuncion Mendoza-Mendoza; Enrique Solano-Reina
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Class III correction using an inter-arch spring-loaded module.

Authors:  Robert Vanlaecken; Michael O Williams; Thomas Razmus; Erdogan Gunel; Chris Martin; Peter Ngan
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 2.750

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.