Literature DB >> 20348019

Mechanisms of the formation of radiation-induced chromosomal aberrations.

Peter E Bryant1, Andrew C Riches, Samantha Y A Terry.   

Abstract

Although much is now known about the mechanisms of radiation-induction of DNA double-strand breaks (DSB), there is less known about the conversion of DSB into chromosomal aberrations. In particular the induction and 'rejoining' of chromatid breaks has been a controversial topic for many years. However, its importance becomes clear in the light of the wide variation in the chromatid break response of human peripheral blood lymphocytes from different individuals when exposed to ionizing radiation, and the elevation of the frequency of radiation-induced chromatid breaks in stimulated peripheral blood lymphocytes of around 40% of breast cancer cases. A common assumption has been that chromatid breaks are merely expansions of initiating DSB, although the classic 'breakage-first' hypothesis (Sax, Ref. 44) was already challenged in the 50's by Revell [30] who maintained that chromatid breaks were formed as a result of an incomplete exchange process initiated by two interacting lesions of an unspecified nature. Here we argue that both these models of chromatid break formation are flawed and we suggest an alternative hypothesis, namely that a radiation-induced DSB initiates an indirect mechanism leading to a chromatid break. This mechanism we suggest involves the nuclear enzyme topoisomerase IIalpha and we present evidence from topoisomerase IIalpha expression variant human cell lines and from siRNA treatment of human cells that supports this hypothesis. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20348019      PMCID: PMC6175058          DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2010.03.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  43 in total

1.  Less G(2) arrest in irradiated cells of breast cancer patients than in female controls: a contribution to their enhanced chromosomal radiosensitivity?

Authors:  D Scott; A R Spreadborough; S A Roberts
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.694

2.  Inhibition of topoisomerase II by antitumor agents bis(2,6-dioxopiperazine) derivatives.

Authors:  K Tanabe; Y Ikegami; R Ishida; T Andoh
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1991-09-15       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Suppression of topoisomerase IIalpha expression and function in human cells decreases chromosomal radiosensitivity.

Authors:  Samantha Y A Terry; Andrew C Riches; Peter E Bryant
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  High constant incidence in twins and other relatives of women with breast cancer.

Authors:  J Peto; T M Mack
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Activation of topoisomerase II-mediated excision of chromosomal DNA loops during oxidative stress.

Authors:  T K Li; A Y Chen; C Yu; Y Mao; H Wang; L F Liu
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1999-06-15       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  Environmental and heritable factors in the causation of cancer--analyses of cohorts of twins from Sweden, Denmark, and Finland.

Authors:  P Lichtenstein; N V Holm; P K Verkasalo; A Iliadou; J Kaprio; M Koskenvuo; E Pukkala; A Skytthe; K Hemminki
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-07-13       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Increased chromosomal radiosensitivity in breast cancer patients: a comparison of two assays.

Authors:  D Scott; J B Barber; A R Spreadborough; W Burrill; S A Roberts
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.694

8.  Chromosomal radiosensitivity as a marker of predisposition to common cancers?

Authors:  K Baria; C Warren; S A Roberts; C M West; D Scott
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-04-06       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Sensitivity to radiation-induced chromosome damage may be a marker of genetic predisposition in young head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  R Papworth; N Slevin; S A Roberts; D Scott
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-03-23       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  A role for topoisomerase II alpha in the formation of radiation-induced chromatid breaks.

Authors:  S Y A Terry; A C Riches; P E Bryant
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  7 in total

1.  Mycobacterium tuberculosis Ku can bind to nuclear DNA damage and sensitize mammalian cells to bleomycin sulfate.

Authors:  Reneau Castore; Cameron Hughes; Austin Debeaux; Jingxin Sun; Cailing Zeng; Shih-Ya Wang; Kelly Tatchell; Runhua Shi; Kyung-Jong Lee; David J Chen; Lynn Harrison
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 3.000

2.  Gamma-ray-induced mutagen sensitivity and risk of sporadic breast cancer in young women: a case-control study.

Authors:  Li-E Wang; Chan H Han; Ping Xiong; Melissa L Bondy; Tse-Kuan Yu; Abenaa M Brewster; Sanjay Shete; Banu K Arun; Thomas A Buchholz; Qingyi Wei
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Evaluating chromosomal damage in workers exposed to hexavalent chromium and the modulating role of polymorphisms of DNA repair genes.

Authors:  Erika Halasova; Tatiana Matakova; Ludovit Musak; Veronika Polakova; Lucia Letkova; Dusan Dobrota; Pavel Vodicka
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2011-08-20       Impact factor: 3.015

4.  Nucleoporin 54 contributes to homologous recombination repair and post-replicative DNA integrity.

Authors:  Gonzalo Rodriguez-Berriguete; Giovanna Granata; Rathi Puliyadi; Gaganpreet Tiwana; Remko Prevo; Rhodri S Wilson; Sheng Yu; Francesca Buffa; Timothy C Humphrey; W Gillies McKenna; Geoff S Higgins
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Increased Gene Targeting in Hyper-Recombinogenic LymphoBlastoid Cell Lines Leaves Unchanged DSB Processing by Homologous Recombination.

Authors:  Emil Mladenov; Katja Paul-Konietzko; Veronika Mladenova; Martin Stuschke; George Iliakis
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 6.208

6.  Requirement for Parp-1 and DNA ligases 1 or 3 but not of Xrcc1 in chromosomal translocation formation by backup end joining.

Authors:  Aashish Soni; Maria Siemann; Martha Grabos; Tamara Murmann; Gabriel E Pantelias; George Iliakis
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-04-19       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 7.  Novel Biological Approaches for Testing the Contributions of Single DSBs and DSB Clusters to the Biological Effects of High LET Radiation.

Authors:  Veronika Mladenova; Emil Mladenov; George Iliakis
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 6.244

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.