OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the influence of irradiation distance and the use of cooling in the Er:YAG laser efficacy in preventing enamel demineralization. METHODS:84 enamel blocks were randomly assigned to seven groups (n=12): G1: control group - no treatment, G2-G7: experimental groups treated with Er:YAG laser (80mJ/2Hz) at different irradiation distances with or without cooling: G2: 4mm/2mL; G3: 4mm/no cooling; G4: 8mm/2mL; G5: 8mm/no cooling; G6: 16mm/2mL; G7: 16mm/no cooling. The samples were submitted to an in vitro pH cycles for 14 days. Next, the specimens were sectioned in sections of 80-100microm in thickness and the demineralization patterns of prepared slices were assessed using a polarized light microscope. Three samples from each group were analyzed with scanning electronic microscopy. Analysis of variance and the Fisher test were performed for the statistical analysis of the data obtained from the caries-lesion-depth measurements (CLDM) (alpha=5%). RESULTS: The control group (CLDM=0.67mm) was statistically different from group 2 (CLDM=0.42mm), which presented a smaller lesion depth, and group 6 (0.91mm), which presented a greater lesion depth. The results of groups 3 (CLDM=0.74mm), 4 (CLDM=0.70mm), 5 (CLDM=0.67mm) and 7 (CLDM=0.89mm) presented statistical similarity. The scanning electronic microscopy analysis showed ablation areas in the samples from groups 4, 5, 6 and 7, and a slightly demineralized area in group 2. CONCLUSIONS: It was possible to conclude that Er:YAG laser was efficient in preventing enamel demineralization at a 4-mm irradiation distance using cooling. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the influence of irradiation distance and the use of cooling in the Er:YAG laser efficacy in preventing enamel demineralization. METHODS: 84 enamel blocks were randomly assigned to seven groups (n=12): G1: control group - no treatment, G2-G7: experimental groups treated with Er:YAG laser (80mJ/2Hz) at different irradiation distances with or without cooling: G2: 4mm/2mL; G3: 4mm/no cooling; G4: 8mm/2mL; G5: 8mm/no cooling; G6: 16mm/2mL; G7: 16mm/no cooling. The samples were submitted to an in vitro pH cycles for 14 days. Next, the specimens were sectioned in sections of 80-100microm in thickness and the demineralization patterns of prepared slices were assessed using a polarized light microscope. Three samples from each group were analyzed with scanning electronic microscopy. Analysis of variance and the Fisher test were performed for the statistical analysis of the data obtained from the caries-lesion-depth measurements (CLDM) (alpha=5%). RESULTS: The control group (CLDM=0.67mm) was statistically different from group 2 (CLDM=0.42mm), which presented a smaller lesion depth, and group 6 (0.91mm), which presented a greater lesion depth. The results of groups 3 (CLDM=0.74mm), 4 (CLDM=0.70mm), 5 (CLDM=0.67mm) and 7 (CLDM=0.89mm) presented statistical similarity. The scanning electronic microscopy analysis showed ablation areas in the samples from groups 4, 5, 6 and 7, and a slightly demineralized area in group 2. CONCLUSIONS: It was possible to conclude that Er:YAG laser was efficient in preventing enamel demineralization at a 4-mm irradiation distance using cooling. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors: R S Scatolin; V Colucci; T P Lepri; A K Alexandria; L C Maia; R Galo; M C Borsatto; S A M Corona Journal: Lasers Med Sci Date: 2014-07-02 Impact factor: 3.161