Literature DB >> 20346261

Variability of lower extremity joint kinematics during backward walking in a virtual environment.

Dimitrios Katsavelis1, Mukul Mukherjee, Leslie Decker, Nicholas Stergiou.   

Abstract

Backward walking (BW) shows significant differences with forward walking (FW) and these differences are potentially useful in rehabilitation. However the lack of visual cues makes BW risky. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of visual cues provided by a virtual environment on FW and BW on gait variability. Each subject underwent four conditions of treadmill walking at self-selected pace. The subjects walked backwards in three conditions and forwards in the fourth condition. A virtual corridor was displayed to the subjects in the FW condition (forward optic flow) and two of the backward conditions (forward and backward optic flow). The third BW condition was a control condition (no visual cues). Gait variability measures of the hip, knee and ankle range of motion and the stride interval were analyzed. Magnitude of variability was evaluated with the coefficient of variation and structure of variability with approximate entropy. Significant differences were demonstrated between the FW and the BW gait characteristics as well as in gait variability (for both magnitude and structure of variability). No significant differences were found between the three BW conditions as a result of the direction of visual cues. In order to get optimal benefit of BW in the aged and the diseased, optical flow of visual feedback may need to be manipulated in a different manner than FW. Future studies will explore other parameters of visual cues like the velocity of optic flow and appearance of obstacles to obtain the best visual cue configuration for rehabilitation.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20346261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci        ISSN: 1090-0578


  8 in total

1.  Selective bilateral activation of leg muscles after cutaneous nerve stimulation during backward walking.

Authors:  Wouter Hoogkamer; Firas Massaad; Karen Jansen; Sjoerd M Bruijn; Jacques Duysens
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Detecting temporal reversals in human locomotion.

Authors:  Paolo Viviani; Francesca Figliozzi; Giovanna Cristina Campione; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  New insights into anterior cruciate ligament deficiency and reconstruction through the assessment of knee kinematic variability in terms of nonlinear dynamics.

Authors:  Leslie M Decker; Constantina Moraiti; Nicholas Stergiou; Anastasios D Georgoulis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Effects of virtual reality-based ankle exercise on the dynamic balance, muscle tone, and gait of stroke patients.

Authors:  Changho Yom; Hwi-Young Cho; ByoungHee Lee
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-03-31

5.  Fractal analyses reveal independent complexity and predictability of gait.

Authors:  Frédéric Dierick; Anne-Laure Nivard; Olivier White; Fabien Buisseret
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Sample Entropy of Human Gait Center of Pressure Displacement: A Systematic Methodological Analysis.

Authors:  Samira Ahmadi; Nariman Sepehri; Christine Wu; Tony Szturm
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 2.524

Review 7.  Entropy Analysis in Gait Research: Methodological Considerations and Recommendations.

Authors:  Jennifer M Yentes; Peter C Raffalt
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Agreement of Gait Events Detection during Treadmill Backward Walking by Kinematic Data and Inertial Motion Units.

Authors:  Uri Gottlieb; Tharani Balasukumaran; Jay R Hoffman; Shmuel Springer
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 3.576

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.