| Literature DB >> 20346179 |
Kenji Kumagai1, Susumu Shirabe2, Noriaki Miyata1, Masakazu Murata1, Atsushi Yamauchi3, Yasuhumi Kataoka3, Masami Niwa4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pentosan polysulfate sodium (pentosan) is a semi-synthetic drug manufactured from beech-wood hemicellulose by sulfate esterification of the xylopyranose hydroxyl groups. From in vitro and animal model studies, pentosan has been proposed as a disease modifying osteoarthritis drug (DMOAD). The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction in patients with mild radiographic knee osteoarthritis (OA) findings and OA-associated symptoms and signs.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20346179 PMCID: PMC2873929 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6904-10-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Clin Pharmacol ISSN: 1472-6904
Figure 1Flexion angle of knee joint. The hydrarthroses were reduced quickly in all cases. The ROM of knee joint was improved significantly. Clinical improvements were maintained at the one-year follow-up.
Primary outcomes
| weeks | 0 | 4 | 8 | 11 | 24 | 52 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| flexion angle | Ave ± SD | 132.2 ± 12.4 | 140.5 ± 8.03 | 142.9 ± 8.25 | 144.75 ± 7.41 | 144.35 ± 8.11 | 141.4 ± 7.74 |
| % variation | 0 | 5.8 | 7.61 | 9 | 8.7 | 6.5 | |
| *: p ‹ 0.05 | * | * | * | * | * | ||
| VAS after 50 m walking | Ave ± SD | 27.7 ± 21.7 | 23.4 ± 16.4 | 16.5 ± 17.7 | 9.7 ± 14.3 | 9.8 ± 12.1 | 8.7 ± 12.2 |
| % variation | 0 | -30.49 | -53.5 | -65.0 | -66.67 | -64.65 | |
| *: p ‹ 0.05 | |||||||
| VAS after 5 min rest | Ave ± SD | 21.9 ± 21.3 | 18.8 ± 17.9 | 13.4 ± 16.1 | 8.8 ± 13.1 | 8.2 ± 13.7 | 8.1 ± 11.7 |
| % variation | 0 | -14.4 | -38.6 | -60 | -62.6 | -63 | |
| *: p ‹ 0.05 | |||||||
| VAS up & down stair walking | Ave ± SD | 41 ± 23.3 | 27.3 ± 16.2 | 18.6 ± 17.9 | 15.6 ± 17.2 | 12.8 ± 15.2 | 16.7 ± 17 |
| % variation | 0 | -33.5 | -54.6 | -62 | -68.7 | -59.3 | |
| *: p ‹ 0.05 | * | * | * | * | |||
| VAS ROM exercise | Ave ± SD | 42.1 ± 25.4 | 29.3 ± 16.8 | 19.6 ± 17.8 | 13.0 ± 14.2 | 14.1 ± 15.8 | 14.9 ± 13.4 |
| %variation | 0 | -30.49 | -53.5 | -69.3 | -66.67 | -64.65 | |
| *: p ‹ 0.05 | * | * | * | * | |||
| C2C | Ave ± SD | 39.7 ± 9.3 | 32.3 ± 11.7 | 31.4 ± 10.7 | 30.8 ± 9.8 | 31.9 ± 10.9 | |
| %variation | 0 | -18.64 | -20.91 | -22.41 | -19.65 | ||
| *: p ‹ 0.05 | * | * |
The parameters were shown at entry point, 4th, 8th, 11th, 24th, and 52nd weeks. They were provided as absolute levels, percentage of variation with time and statistical significance. There were statistically significant improvements from the baseline score in flexion angle at 4th, 8th, 11th, 24th, and 52nd weeks; in VAS up and down stair walking and in VAS knee R.O.M. exercises at 8th, 11th, 24th, and 52nd weeks; and in C2C concentration in blood at 11th and 24th weeks. The parameters, not limited to significant value, showed improvement in the percentage of variation with time. The improvement might appear in the late phase of injection and continue to 52 weeks.
The asterisks indicate statistically significant improvement.
Figure 2Pain scores after climbing up and down stairs. Pain scores after climbing up and down stairs, measured by VAS, was improved significantly. This improvement was maintained for almost one year.
Figure 3Concentration of C2C in Blood. The concentration of C2C in the blood decreased significantly at 8 and 24 weeks. To check the change of type II collagen metabolism, we measured C2C as a degradation marker of type II collagen, as C2C is said to be the only reliable marker of cartilage metabolism. The significant decreasing tendency of C2C is thought to be more objective than those parameters measured with VAS and ROM findings in this study.
Secondary Outcomes
| weeks | 0 | 4 | 8 | 11 | 24 | 52 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WOMAC total | Ave ± SD | 35.53 ± 15.03 | 39.75 ± 16.69 | 29.65 ± 20.4 | 23.4 ± 16.53 | 27.25 ± 19.68 | 26.74 ± 18.7 |
| % variation | 0 | 11.88 | -16.55 | -34.14 | -23.3 | -24.75 | |
| *: p ‹ 0.05 | |||||||
| WOMAC pain | Ave ± SD | 3.47 ± 1.77 | 3.5 ± 1.47 | 2.45 ± 1.7 | 2.3 ± 1.3 | 2.4 ± 1.85 | 2.53 ± 1.43 |
| % variation | 0 | 0.95 | -29.33 | -33.66 | -30.78 | -27.13 | |
| *: p ‹ 0.05 | |||||||
| Pain at rest | Ave ± SD | 14.85 ± 12.4 | 15.15 ± 8.03 | 14.15 ± 8.25 | 7.25 ± 7.41 | 6.85 ± 8.11 | 6.65 ± 7.74 |
| % variation | 0 | 2.02 | -4.71 | -51.18 | -53.87 | -55.22 | |
| *: p ‹ 0.05 | |||||||
| Pain while walking | Ave ± SD | 32.1 ± 12.4 | 21.9 ± 8.03 | 18.5 ± 8.25 | 11.5 ± 7.41 | 11.8 ± 8.11 | 11.4 ± 7.74 |
| % variation | 0 | -31.8 | -42.5 | -64.3 | -63.4 | -64.5 | |
| *: p ‹ 0.05 | * | * | * |
The parameters were shown at entry point, 4th, 8th, 11th, 24th, and 52nd weeks. They were provided as absolute levels, percentage of variation with time and statistical significance. The asterisks indicate statistically significant improvement.
There were significant differences in the values between individual follow-up points in the WOMAC scores, but there was no significant difference in the data comparing the baseline and each follow-up. Pain when walking, as initial checks of each visit at our clinic, showed statistical improvement compared to the baseline measurements at 11th, 24th, and 52nd weeks. These values showed remarkable improvement in percentage of variation with time.
Figure 4WOMAC scores. There were significant differences in the values between individual follow-up points in the WOMAC scores, but there was no significant difference in the data comparing the baseline and each follow-up. This may have been due to a problem with the baseline evaluation or the techniques of the score system
Figure 5Activated Clotting Time (ACT) and Prothrombin Time (INR) 1 hour after injection. a: ACT, b: PT (INR). Activated clotting time (ACT) is a measure of the anticoagulation affects of heparin. So we checked the level of ACT, as well as usual blood coagulation test one hour after every injection. The dose of pentosan affected the ACT value, but the values were within a safe range. For PT (INR), the highest value was 1.47, which was weaker than the prophylactic administration of cardiovascular event.
Figure 6Serum triglycerides 1 hour after injection. Slightly abnormal findings were noted in serum triglycerides at one hour after injection, but this was reduced quickly in the follow-up period.