Literature DB >> 20345400

Phylogenetic comparative methods strengthen evidence for reduced genetic diversity among endangered tetrapods.

Patrick A Flight1.   

Abstract

The fitness of species with little genetic diversity is expected to be affected by inbreeding and an inability to respond to environmental change. Conservation theory suggests that endangered species will generally demonstrate lower genetic diversity than taxa that are not threatened. This hypothesis has been challenged because the time frame of anthropogenic extinction may be too fast to expect genetic factors to significantly contribute. I conducted a meta-analysis to examine how genetic diversity in 894 tetrapods correlates with extinction threat level. Because species are not evolutionarily independent, I used a phylogenetic regression framework to address this issue. Mean genetic diversity of tetrapods, as assessed by protein heterozygosity, was 29.7-31.5% lower on average in threatened species than in their nonthreatened relatives, a highly significant reduction. Within amphibians as diversity decreased extinction risk increased in phylogenetic models, but not in nonphylogenetic regressions. The effects of threatened status on diversity also remained significant after accounting for body size in mammals. These results support the hypothesis that genetic effects on population fitness are important in the extinction process.
© 2010 Society for Conservation Biology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20345400      PMCID: PMC3927791          DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01498.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  22 in total

1.  Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile.

Authors:  Simon P Blomberg; Theodore Garland; Anthony R Ives
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Most species are not driven to extinction before genetic factors impact them.

Authors:  Derek Spielman; Barry W Brook; Richard Frankham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-10-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Population size does not influence mitochondrial genetic diversity in animals.

Authors:  Eric Bazin; Sylvain Glémin; Nicolas Galtier
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Evolution in Mendelian Populations.

Authors:  S Wright
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1931-03       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  A comment on phylogenetic correction.

Authors:  F James Rohlf
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Within-species variation and measurement error in phylogenetic comparative methods.

Authors:  Anthony R Ives; Peter E Midford; Theodore Garland
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 15.683

7.  Phylogenetic inheritance of genetic variability produced by neutral models of evolution.

Authors:  J José; W J Puma-Villanueva; F J Von Zuben; J A F Diniz-Filho
Journal:  Genet Mol Res       Date:  2008

8.  The phylogenetic regression.

Authors:  A Grafen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1989-12-21       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Genetics and demography in biological conservation.

Authors:  R Lande
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-09-16       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Colloquium paper: phylogenetic trees and the future of mammalian biodiversity.

Authors:  T Jonathan Davies; Susanne A Fritz; Richard Grenyer; C David L Orme; Jon Bielby; Olaf R P Bininda-Emonds; Marcel Cardillo; Kate E Jones; John L Gittleman; Georgina M Mace; Andy Purvis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-11       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  How closely does genetic diversity in finite populations conform to predictions of neutral theory? Large deficits in regions of low recombination.

Authors:  R Frankham
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Reconstructing hotspots of genetic diversity from glacial refugia and subsequent dispersal in Italian common toads (Bufo bufo).

Authors:  Andrea Chiocchio; Jan W Arntzen; Iñigo Martínez-Solano; Wouter de Vries; Roberta Bisconti; Alice Pezzarossa; Luigi Maiorano; Daniele Canestrelli
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.