| Literature DB >> 20339971 |
Satoshi Okayama1, Shiro Uemura, Makoto Watanabe, Yoshinobu Morikawa, Kenji Onoue, Tsunenari Soeda, Hajime Iwama, Satoshi Somekawa, Yukiji Takeda, Hiroki Uramoto, Yoshiyuki Kobayashi, Yoshihiko Saito.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to clarify the characteristics of black-blood echo-planar imaging (BB-EPI) in the assessment of infarct-related myocardial edema (IRME), compared with T2-weighted imaging (T2WI). Thirteen acute myocardial infarction (MI) patients after reperfusion and 11 old MI patients underwent BB-EPI and T2WI, excluding those with posterior MI. In acute MI patients, signal intensity ratio (SI ratio) of edema to normal myocardium was measured. Black-blood echo-planar imaging revealed hyperintensity in the same region identified as IRME on T2WI in all acute MI patients, and SI ratio was significantly higher in BB-EPI (2.66 +/- 1.58) than in T2WI (1.44 +/- 0.22) (P < 0.05). However, BB-EPI showed hyperintensity in posterior wall, where there is no clinical evidence of acute MI, in 2 out of 13 acute MI patients. Both T2WI and BB-EPI detected no IRME in known old infarct area of all old MI patients, but BB-EPI showed hyperintensity in the posterior wall of 4 out of 11 old MI patients. Black-blood echo-planar imaging can depict IRME with sufficient suppression of background and blood flow signals, and with excellent edema-to-normal myocardium contrast resolution. However, BB-EPI sometimes shows an inconsistent signal area with T2WI specifically in posterior wall. The wide practical use of BB-EPI requires the solution to this serious problem.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20339971 DOI: 10.1007/s00380-009-1172-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heart Vessels ISSN: 0910-8327 Impact factor: 2.037