Literature DB >> 2033954

Tissue reaction to intraperitoneally implanted catheter materials.

E S Wilkins1.   

Abstract

The limiting factor that introduces long-term complications of intraperitoneal (i.p.) catheters used, for example, with the Programable Implantable Medication System (PIMS) is the encapsulation of the catheter tip with tissues due to tissue reaction. The objective is the development of new catheters for PIMS or other systems for i.p. insulin delivery that allow continued insulin flow. The study is based on two hypotheses: (1) vascularized tissue will grow into a porous end plug mounted at the catheter tip (100-300 microns pore diameter), with sufficient blood supply to carry the insulin to the circulation; (2) use of a narrow pore diameter (25 microns or less) end plug will prevent tissue ingrowth yet allow insulin flow. The biological response to the following materials, all designed for use in catheters, were studied: polyurethane, segmented polyether-urethane, alumina coated on Teflon (proplast regular and micro-pore), pyrolytic carbon, high density polyethylene, ultra high molecular weight polyethylene, hydroxyapatite, bioglass, and expanded Teflon. Some of these materials also are used for several other applications: vascular grafts, in the cardiovascular system, and for dental, orthopaedic, and other purposes. The shape and size of the end plugs made from each of the materials were as similar as possible to minimize size effects. The test materials were implanted i.p. in 12 dogs for a period of 12 weeks. The cylindrical plugs were typically 1.5-2.5 cm long, with an inside diameter of 0.3 cm, and an outside diameter of 0.6 cm. When the explants were retrieved, thin capsules were observed, of varying thickness and blood supply, surrounding the end of the catheters.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2033954     DOI: 10.1016/0141-5425(91)90065-f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0141-5425


  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of fenestrated and non-fenestrated biologic grafts in a porcine model of mature ventral incisional hernia repair.

Authors:  E D Jenkins; L Melman; C R Deeken; S C Greco; M M Frisella; B D Matthews
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Biomechanical and histologic evaluation of fenestrated and nonfenestrated biologic mesh in a porcine model of ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  Eric D Jenkins; Lora Melman; Corey R Deeken; Suellen C Greco; Margaret M Frisella; Brent D Matthews
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 6.113

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.