| Literature DB >> 20339445 |
Bejai R Sarosh, Ute Wittstock, Barbara Ann Halkier, Barbara Ekbom.
Abstract
The oviposition preference and larval performance of the diamondback moth (DBM), Plutella xylostella, was studied using Arabidopsis thaliana plants with modified glucosinolate (GS) profiles containing novel GSs as a result of the introduction of individual CYP79 genes. The insect parameters were determined in a series of bioassays. The GS content of the plants as well as the number of trichomes were measured. Multivariate analysis was used to determine the possible relationships among insect and plant variables. The novel GSs in the tested lines did not appear to have any unequivocal effect on the DBM. Instead, the plant characteristics that affected larval performance and larval preference did not influence oviposition preference. Trichomes did not affect oviposition, but influenced larval parameters negatively. Although the tested A. thaliana lines had earlier been shown to influence disease resistance, in this study no clear results were found for P. xylostella.Entities:
Year: 2009 PMID: 20339445 PMCID: PMC2835634 DOI: 10.1007/s00049-009-0028-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chemoecology ISSN: 0937-7409 Impact factor: 1.725
Plutella xylostella (diamondback moth) preference and performance on A. thaliana genotypes with different glucosinolate profiles
| Plant genotypes | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Col-0 | CYP79A1.18 | CYP79A1.6.3.1.1 | CYP79A2.30.6 | CYPA2.10.1 | CYP79D2.28 | CYP79D2.5 | |
| Oviposition preference | |||||||
| Number of eggs | 13.5 (2.10) ab | 18.1 (1.96) a | 9.3 (1.88) b | 12.8 (2.21) ab | 14.0 (2.17) ab | 19.7 (2.74) a | 18.7 (2.73) a |
| Proportion eggs | 0.04 (0.004) b | 0.06 (0.008) a | 0.025 (0.004) c | 0.04 (0.004) b | 0.05 (0.004) ab | 0.06 (0.008) a | 0.05 (0.007) ab |
| Larval performance | |||||||
| No choice | |||||||
| Percentage of leaf eaten | 3.40 (0.34) | 3.75 (0.23) | 3.65 (0.31) | 2.80 (0.25) | 3.10 (0.32) | 2.80 (0.26) | 2.75 (0.31) |
| Days to adult | 6.8 (0.25) | 7.0 (0.15) | 6.5 (0.17) | 6.7 (0.21) | 6.6 (0.16) | 6.4 (0.16) | 6.5 (0.17) |
| Pupal weight (mg) | 4.24 (0.13) | 4.52 (0.13) | 4.42 (0.11) | 4.61 (0.15) | 4.37 (0.20) | 4.38 (0.22) | 4.36 (0.14) |
| Choice | |||||||
| Percentage of leaf eaten | 23.8 (4.23) a | 20.9 (4.54) a | 27.8 (5.00) a | 23.5 (2.27) a | 9.9 (4.34) b | 18.1 (2.74) a | 10.9 (4.03) b |
| Number of larvae on leaf | 1.6 (0.34) a | 1.2 (0.25) a | 1.3 (0.26) a | 1.8 (0.20) a | 0.6 (0.27) b | 1.1 (0.18) a | 0.5 (0.17) b |
Values in the table are means and standard error (in parentheses). Different letters within a row indicate significant differences (P < 0.05), least squares means t test
Plant characteristics of A. thaliana genotypes with different glucosinolate profiles
| Plant genotypes | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Col-0 | CYP79A1.18 | CYP79A1.6.3.1.1 | CYP79A2.30.6 | CYPA2.10.1 | CYP79D2.28 | CYP79D2.5 | |
| Trichomes | |||||||
| Number per 20 mm2
| 11.0 (0.49) b | 12.2 (0.94) ab | 13.8 (0.63) ab | 13.4 (0.76) ab | 14.2 (0.96) ab | 15.5 (0.99) a | 12.4 (0.37) ab |
| Glucosinolates nmol/mg dry weight | |||||||
| Total glucosinolates F = 4.70, p = 0.0005 | 11.57 (3.15) ab | 5.79 (1.05) bc | 2.92 (0.90) c | 12.93 (1.51) a | 7.97 (1.31) abc | 8.03 (1.07) abc | 5.75 (1.03) bc |
| | 0 b | 1.28 (0.28) a | 0.89 (0.38) a | 0 b | 0 b | 0 b | 0 b |
| Benzyl- | 0 c | 0 c | 0 c | 4.85 (0.50) a | 2.16 (0.40) b | 0 c | 0 c |
| Methylethyl- | 0 b | 0 b | 0 b | 0 b | 0 b | 0.65 (0.17) a
| 0 b |
| Isobutyl- | 0 b | 0 b | 0 b | 0 b | 0 b | 0.24 (0.07) a
| 0 b |
| 3-Methylsulfinylpropyl- | 0.97 (0.30) a
| 0.37 (0.07) b | 0.19 (0.05) b
| 0.66 (0.08) ab
| 0.52 (0.07) ab
| 0.60 (0.08) ab
| 0.53 (0.10) ab
|
| 4-Methylsulfinylbutyl- | 8.40 (2.49) a
| 3.46 (0.65) b | 1.53 (0.36) b | 5.48 (0.72) ab
| 4.20 (0.67) b
| 5.64 (0.77) ab
| 3.87 (0.54) b
|
| 7-Methylsulfinylheptyl- | 0.18 (0.05) a
| 0.08 (0.01) ab
| 0.03 (0.02) b | 0.14 (0.03) a | 0.10 (0.01) ab
| 0.17 (0.03) a
| 0.08 (0.02) ab
|
| Indol-3-ylmethyl- | 1.63 (0.30) a
| 0.48 (0.08) b | 0.20 (0.09) b
| 0.27 (0.03) b | 0.14 (0.05) b
| 0.64 (0.07) b
| 0.38 (0.04) b
|
| 8-Methylsulfinyloctyl- | 0 c | 0 c | 0.03 (0.03) c
| 1.50 (0.19) a
| 0.82 (0.14) b | 0 c | 0.79 (0.40) b
|
| 4-Methoxyindol-3-ylmethyl- | 0.30 (0.03) a
| 0.07 (0.01) bc
| 0.04 (0.01) cd | 0.02 (0.01) d | 0.004 (0.004) d | 0.10 (0.01) b
| 0.09 (0.01) b
|
| 3-Benzoyloxypropyl- | 0.03 (0.02) | 0.01 (0.01) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1-Methoxyindol-3-ylmethyl- | 0.07 (0.02) a
| 0.05 (0.004) ab
| 0.03 (0.02) ab | 0.01 (0.01) b | 0.03 (0.01) ab | 0.003 (0.003) b | 0.004 (0.004) b |
Values in the table are means and standard error (in parentheses). Results of the ANOVA are shown with the plant characteristic. Degrees of freedom for all F tests are df 6,63. Different letters within a row indicate significant differences (P < 0.05), Student–Newman–Keuls test. For individual glucosinolates per cent of total glucosinolates is shown in italics style (percentages <1% not shown)
Fig. 1Glucosinolate composition of the different 35S:CYP79 transgenic lines. PCA using proportion of total glucosinolates. Eigenvalues are 0.443 for axis 1 and 0.268 for axis 2. The two axes explain 71.1% of the variation. Plant genotypes are represented by circles and are as follows: 1 Col-0, 2 35S:CYP79A1.18, 3 35S:CYP79A1.6.3.1.1, 4 35S:CYP79A2.30.6, 5 35S:CYPA2.10.1, 6 35S:CYP79D2.28, 7 35S:CYP79D2.5. Glucosinolates (GS) are: 3msop 3-methylsulfinylpropyl-GS, 4msob 4-methylsulfinylbutyl-GS, 7msoh 7-methylsulfinylheptyl-GS, I3M indol-3-ylmethyl-GS, 4MOI3M 4-methoxyindol-3-ylmethyl-GS, 3bzo 3-benzoyloxypropyl-GS, 1MOI3M 1-methoxyindol-3-ylmethyl-GS, isobutyl isobutyl-GS, meethyl methylethyl-GS, benzyl benzyl-GS, 8msoo 8-methylsulfinyloctyl-GS, pOHB 4-hydroxybenzyl-GS
Fig. 2Analysis of insect preference and performance together with plant characteristics. RDA, variables are centred and standardized. Eigenvalues are 0.473 for axis 1 and 0.224 for axis 2. The two axes explain 69.7% of the variation. Plant genotypes are represented by circles and are as follows: 1 Col-0, 2 35S:CYP79A1.18, 3 35S:CYP79A1.6.3.1.1, 4 35S:CYP79A2.30.6, 5 35S:CYPA2.10.1, 6 35S:CYP79D2.28, 7 35S:CYP79D2.5. Values in red are plant characteristics: glucosinolates as in Fig. 1 and trichomes. Response variables are: eatc % leaf area eaten in choice test, larvae number of larvae found on a genotype (choice test), leafnc % leaf area eaten in no-choice test, wtnc final pupal weight in no-choice test, daync number of days to pupation in no-choice test, pegg % of eggs laid on a genotype, totegg total eggs laid on a genotype