BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is increasingly being performed for early gastric cancers (EGCs) that are larger than 2 cm and those that are not intestinal-type (IT) cancers by Lauren's classification. The technical feasibility of ESD for these EGCs has not been fully evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To identify appropriate expanded indications for ESD of EGC. DESIGN AND SETTING: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed on consecutive patients who underwent ESD at a single tertiary center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In total, 487 EGCs in 461 patients treated by ESD were classified by size and histologic type: IT EGCs 2 cm or less (257 lesions in 235 patients), IT EGCs larger than 2 cm (172 lesions in 168 patients), and non-IT EGCs (58 lesions in 58 patients). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Curative resections were assessed among the 3 groups, and logistic regression analysis was used to analyze factors related to curative resection. RESULTS: The rates of curative resection significantly decreased from IT EGCs 2 cm or less (88.7%) to IT EGCs larger than 2 cm (73.3%) to non-IT EGCs (37.9%). Tumor size (>3 cm), ulceration, histologic type (non-IT), and piecemeal resection were independently unfavorable factors in curative resection. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size and short-term duration of follow-up study. CONCLUSIONS: ESD with curative intent is technically most feasible for nonulcerative and IT EGCs smaller than 3 cm. 2010 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is increasingly being performed for early gastric cancers (EGCs) that are larger than 2 cm and those that are not intestinal-type (IT) cancers by Lauren's classification. The technical feasibility of ESD for these EGCs has not been fully evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To identify appropriate expanded indications for ESD of EGC. DESIGN AND SETTING: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed on consecutive patients who underwent ESD at a single tertiary center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In total, 487 EGCs in 461 patients treated by ESD were classified by size and histologic type: IT EGCs 2 cm or less (257 lesions in 235 patients), IT EGCs larger than 2 cm (172 lesions in 168 patients), and non-IT EGCs (58 lesions in 58 patients). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Curative resections were assessed among the 3 groups, and logistic regression analysis was used to analyze factors related to curative resection. RESULTS: The rates of curative resection significantly decreased from IT EGCs 2 cm or less (88.7%) to IT EGCs larger than 2 cm (73.3%) to non-IT EGCs (37.9%). Tumor size (>3 cm), ulceration, histologic type (non-IT), and piecemeal resection were independently unfavorable factors in curative resection. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size and short-term duration of follow-up study. CONCLUSIONS: ESD with curative intent is technically most feasible for nonulcerative and IT EGCs smaller than 3 cm. 2010 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Chang Seok Bang; Gwang Ho Baik; In Soo Shin; Jing Bong Kim; Ki Tae Suk; Jai Hoon Yoon; Yeon Soo Kim; Dong Joon Kim; Woon Geon Shin; Kyung Ho Kim; Hak Yang Kim; Hyun Lim; Ho Seok Kang; Jong Hyeok Kim; Jin Bae Kim; Sung Won Jung; Sea Hyub Kae; Hyun Joo Jang; Min Ho Choi Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-05-21 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Chung Hyun Tae; Roos E Pouw; Lucas C Duits; Young Kyung Sung; Byung-Hoon Min; Jun Haeng Lee; Poong-Lyul Rhee; Kyoung-Mee Kim; Jacques J G H M Bergman; Jae J Kim Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2014-10-08 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Zhong-Sheng Lu; Yun-Sheng Yang; Dan Feng; Shu-Fang Wang; Jing Yuan; Jin Huang; Xiang-Dong Wang; Jiang-Yun Meng; Hong Du; Hong-Bin Wang Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2012-12-21 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Seong Ran Jeon; Joo Young Cho; Gene Hyun Bok; Tae Hee Lee; Hyun Gun Kim; Won Young Cho; So Young Jin; Yeon Soo Kim Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2012-09-07 Impact factor: 5.742