PURPOSE: To assess how neoadjuvant chemoradiation regimens modulate the immune system state in tumor-draining lymph nodes (TDLN), in the setting of advanced cervical cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Tumor-draining lymph nodes of patients undergoing chemotherapy only (nonirradiated, NI-TDLN) and chemoradiation with lower-dose (39.6 Gy, LD-TDLN) and higher-dose radiation (50 Gy, HD-TDLN) were analyzed by multicolor flow cytometry. RESULTS: Enlarging our previous data, LD-TDLN showed features overall indicative of an enhanced antitumor response as compared with NI-TDLN, namely a significant Th1 and Tc1 polarization and a lower amount of the potent CD4(+)Foxp3(+)CD25(high) regulatory T cell (Treg) subset identified by neuropilin-1 expression. Conversely, compared with NI-TDLN, HD-TDLN showed features overall indicative of an impaired antitumor response, namely a significantly inverted CD4/CD8 cell ratio, a higher Nrp1(+)Treg frequency, and a higher frequency of CCR4(+)Treg, a Treg subset facilitated in migrating out from TDLN to suppress the immune response against distant cancer cells. Moreover, the Th1 and Tc1 polarization induced by LD radiation was lost, and there was an unfavorable tolerogenic/immunogenic dendritic cell ratio compared with LD-TDLN. CONCLUSIONS: Even minor differences in radiation dose in neoadjuvant regimens for locally advanced cervical cancer are crucial for determining the balance between a tolerogenic and an efficacious antitumor immune response in TDLN. Because most of the anticancer immune response takes place in TDLN, the present findings also emphasize the importance of chemoradiation protocols in the context of immunotherapeutic trials.
PURPOSE: To assess how neoadjuvant chemoradiation regimens modulate the immune system state in tumor-draining lymph nodes (TDLN), in the setting of advanced cervical cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Tumor-draining lymph nodes of patients undergoing chemotherapy only (nonirradiated, NI-TDLN) and chemoradiation with lower-dose (39.6 Gy, LD-TDLN) and higher-dose radiation (50 Gy, HD-TDLN) were analyzed by multicolor flow cytometry. RESULTS: Enlarging our previous data, LD-TDLN showed features overall indicative of an enhanced antitumor response as compared with NI-TDLN, namely a significant Th1 and Tc1 polarization and a lower amount of the potent CD4(+)Foxp3(+)CD25(high) regulatory T cell (Treg) subset identified by neuropilin-1 expression. Conversely, compared with NI-TDLN, HD-TDLN showed features overall indicative of an impaired antitumor response, namely a significantly inverted CD4/CD8 cell ratio, a higher Nrp1(+)Treg frequency, and a higher frequency of CCR4(+)Treg, a Treg subset facilitated in migrating out from TDLN to suppress the immune response against distant cancer cells. Moreover, the Th1 and Tc1 polarization induced by LD radiation was lost, and there was an unfavorable tolerogenic/immunogenic dendritic cell ratio compared with LD-TDLN. CONCLUSIONS: Even minor differences in radiation dose in neoadjuvant regimens for locally advanced cervical cancer are crucial for determining the balance between a tolerogenic and an efficacious antitumor immune response in TDLN. Because most of the anticancer immune response takes place in TDLN, the present findings also emphasize the importance of chemoradiation protocols in the context of immunotherapeutic trials.
Authors: Sayuri Miyauchi; P Dominick Sanders; Kripa Guram; Sangwoo S Kim; Francesca Paolini; Aldo Venuti; Ezra E W Cohen; J Silvio Gutkind; Joseph A Califano; Andrew B Sharabi Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2019-12-17 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Falguni Parikh; Dorothée Duluc; Naoko Imai; Amelia Clark; Krzys Misiukiewicz; Marcello Bonomi; Vishal Gupta; Alexis Patsias; Michael Parides; Elizabeth G Demicco; David Y Zhang; Seunghee Kim-Schulze; Johnny Kao; Sacha Gnjatic; Sangkon Oh; Marshall R Posner; Andrew G Sikora Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2014-10-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Yasmin Hasan; Larissa Furtado; Ana Tergas; Nita Lee; Rebecca Brooks; Anne McCall; Daniel Golden; Shruti Jolly; Gini Fleming; Matthew Morrow; Kimberly Kraynyak; Albert Sylvester; Fauzia Arif; Matt Levin; David Schwartz; Jean Boyer; Jeffrey Skolnik; Mark Esser; Rakesh Kumar; Mark Bagarazzi; Ralph Weichselbaum; Michael Spiotto Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2020-03-07 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Shu Liu; Xiangdong Sun; Jinhua Luo; Hongcheng Zhu; Xi Yang; Qing Guo; Yaqi Song; Xinchen Sun Journal: Am J Cancer Res Date: 2015-10-15 Impact factor: 6.166
Authors: Christopher A Chuckran; Anthony R Cillo; Jessica Moskovitz; Abigail Overacre-Delgoffe; Ashwin S Somasundaram; Feng Shan; Grant C Magnon; Sheryl R Kunning; Irina Abecassis; Amer H Zureikat; James Luketich; Arjun Pennathur; John Sembrat; Mauricio Rojas; Daniel T Merrick; Sarah E Taylor; Brian Orr; Francesmary Modugno; Ron Buckanovich; Robert E Schoen; Seungwon Kim; Umamaheswar Duvvuri; Herbert Zeh; Robert Edwards; John M Kirkwood; Lan Coffman; Robert L Ferris; Tullia C Bruno; Dario A A Vignali Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2021-12-08 Impact factor: 19.319