Literature DB >> 20338432

Effects of clinical mastitis caused by gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria and other organisms on the probability of conception in New York State Holstein dairy cows.

J A Hertl1, Y T Gröhn, J D G Leach, D Bar, G J Bennett, R N González, B J Rauch, F L Welcome, L W Tauer, Y H Schukken.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to estimate the effects of different types of clinical mastitis (CM) on the probability of conception in New York State Holstein cows. Data were available on 55,372 artificial inseminations (AI) in 23,695 lactations from 14,148 cows in 7 herds. We used generalized linear mixed models to model whether or not a cow conceived after a particular AI. Independent variables included AI number (first, second, third, fourth), parity, season when AI occurred, farm, type of CM (due to gram-positive bacteria, gram-negative bacteria, or other organisms) in the 6 wk before and after an AI, and occurrence of other diseases. Older cows were less likely to conceive. Inseminations occurring in the summer were least likely to be successful. Retained placenta decreased the probability of conception. Conception was also less likely with each successive AI. The probability of conception associated with the first AI was 0.29. The probability of conception decreased to 0.26, 0.25, and 0.24 for the second, third, and fourth AI, respectively. Clinical mastitis occurring any time between 14 d before until 35 d after an AI was associated with a lower probability of conception; the greatest effect was an 80% reduction associated with gram-negative CM occurring in the week after AI. In general, CM due to gram-negative bacteria had a more detrimental effect on probability of conception than did CM caused by gram-positive bacteria or other organisms. Furthermore, CM had more effect on probability of conception immediately around the time of AI. Additional information about CM (i.e., its timing with respect to AI, and whether the causative agent is gram-positive or gram-negative bacteria, or other organisms) is valuable to dairy personnel in determining why some cows are unable to conceive in a timely manner. These findings are also beneficial for the management of mastitic cows (especially those with gram-negative CM) when mastitis occurs close to AI. Copyright (c) 2010 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20338432     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2009-2599

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  20 in total

1.  Effect of mastitis during the first lactation on production and reproduction performance of Holstein cows.

Authors:  Alireza Heravi Moussavi; Mohsen Danesh Mesgaran; Robert O Gilbert
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 1.559

Review 2.  Mastitis effects on reproductive performance in dairy cattle: a review.

Authors:  Narender Kumar; A Manimaran; A Kumaresan; S Jeyakumar; L Sreela; P Mooventhan; M Sivaram
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2017-03-11       Impact factor: 1.559

Review 3.  Targeting gut microbiota as a possible therapy for mastitis.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Hu; Shumin Li; Yunhe Fu; Naisheng Zhang
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2019-05-11       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Effects of lipopolysaccharide on follicular estrogen production and developmental competence in bovine oocytes.

Authors:  K K Forrest; V V Flores; S C Gurule; S Soto-Navarro; C B Shuster; C A Gifford; J A Hernandez Gifford
Journal:  Anim Reprod Sci       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 2.145

5.  Changes in bovine milk bacterial microbiome from healthy and subclinical mastitis affected animals of the Girolando, Gyr, Guzera, and Holstein breeds.

Authors:  Raphael S Steinberg; Lilian C Silva E Silva; Marcelo R de Souza; Ronaldo B Reis; Patrícia C L da Silva; Gustavo A Lacorte; Jacques R Nicoli; Elisabeth Neumann; Álvaro C Nunes
Journal:  Int Microbiol       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 3.097

6.  Lipopolysaccharide initiates inflammation in bovine granulosa cells via the TLR4 pathway and perturbs oocyte meiotic progression in vitro.

Authors:  John J Bromfield; I Martin Sheldon
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 4.736

7.  Episodes of clinical mastitis and its relationship with duration of treatment and seasonality in crossbred cows maintained in organized dairy farm.

Authors:  Narender Kumar; A Manimaran; A Kumaresan; L Sreela; Tapas Kumar Patbandha; Shiwani Tiwari; Subhash Chandra
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2016-01-21

8.  Milk microbiome and bacterial load following dry cow therapy without antibiotics in dairy cows with healthy mammary gland.

Authors:  Erika C R Bonsaglia; Marilia S Gomes; Igor F Canisso; Ziyao Zhou; Svetlana F Lima; Vera L M Rall; Georgios Oikonomou; Rodrigo C Bicalho; Fabio S Lima
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Influence of clinical mastitis and its treatment outcome on reproductive performance in crossbred cows: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Narender Kumar; A Manimaran; M Sivaram; A Kumaresan; S Jeyakumar; L Sreela; P Mooventhan; D Rajendran
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2017-05-07

10.  Microbiota of cow's milk; distinguishing healthy, sub-clinically and clinically diseased quarters.

Authors:  Georgios Oikonomou; Marcela Lucas Bicalho; Enoch Meira; Rodolfo Elke Rossi; Carla Foditsch; Vinicius Silva Machado; Andre Gustavo Vieira Teixeira; Carlos Santisteban; Ynte Hein Schukken; Rodrigo Carvalho Bicalho
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.