Literature DB >> 20337914

Illness severity scores in veterinary medicine: what can we learn?

G Hayes1, K Mathews, S Kruth, G Doig, C Dewey.   

Abstract

Illness severity scores are gaining increasing popularity in veterinary medicine. This article discusses their applications in both clinical medicine and research, reviews the caveats pertaining to their use, and discusses some of the issues that arise in appropriate construction of a score. Illness severity scores can be used to decrease bias and confounding and add important contextual information to research by providing a quantitative and objective measure of patient illness. In addition, illness severity scores can be used to benchmark performance, and establish protocols for triage and therapeutic management. Many diagnosis-specific and diagnosis-independent veterinary scores have been developed in recent years. Although score use in veterinary research is increasing, the scores available are currently underutilized, particularly in the context of observational studies. Analysis of treatment effect while controlling for illness severity by an objective measure can improve the validity of the conclusions of observational studies. In randomized trials, illness severity scores can be used to demonstrate effective randomization, which is of particular utility when group sizes are small. The quality of veterinary scoring systems can be improved by prospective multicenter validation. The prevalence of euthanasia in companion animal medicine poses a unique challenge to scores based on a mortality outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20337914     DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2010.0483.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Intern Med        ISSN: 0891-6640            Impact factor:   3.333


  4 in total

1.  Short-term survival and mortality rates in a retrospective study of colic in 1588 Danish horses.

Authors:  Mogens T Christophersen; Nana Dupont; Kristina S Berg-Sørensen; Christel Konnerup; Tina H Pihl; Pia H Andersen
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 1.695

2.  Rater agreement on gait assessment during neurologic examination of horses.

Authors:  E Olsen; B Dunkel; W H J Barker; E J T Finding; J D Perkins; T H Witte; L J Yates; P H Andersen; K Baiker; R J Piercy
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 3.333

3.  Predicting Outcome in dogs with Primary Immune-Mediated Hemolytic Anemia: Results of a Multicenter Case Registry.

Authors:  R Goggs; S G Dennis; A Di Bella; K R Humm; G McLauchlan; C Mooney; A Ridyard; S Tappin; D Walker; S Warman; N T Whitley; D C Brodbelt; D L Chan
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 3.333

4.  Analysis of Early Assessable Risk Factors for Poor Outcome in Dogs With Cluster Seizures and Status Epilepticus.

Authors:  Giulia Cagnotti; Sara Ferrini; Ugo Ala; Claudio Bellino; Cristiano Corona; Elena Dappiano; Giorgia Di Muro; Barbara Iulini; Ida Pepe; Silvia Roncone; Antonio D'Angelo
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-10-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.