Literature DB >> 20337674

Ecological trap for desert lizards caused by anthropogenic changes in habitat structure that favor predator activity.

Dror Hawlena1, David Saltz, Zvika Abramsky, Amos Bouskila.   

Abstract

Anthropogenic habitat perturbation is a major cause of population decline. A standard practice managers use to protect populations is to leave portions of natural habitat intact. We describe a case study in which, despite the use of this practice, the critically endangered lizard Acanthodactylus beershebensis was locally extirpated from both manipulated and natural patches within a mosaic landscape of an afforestation project. We hypothesized that increased structural complexity in planted patches favors avian predator activity and makes these patches less suitable for lizards due to a heightened risk of predation. Spatial rarity of natural perches (e.g., trees) in arid scrublands may hinder the ability of desert lizards to associate perches with low-quality habitat, turning planted patches into ecological traps for such species. We erected artificial trees in a structurally simple arid habitat (similar to the way trees were planted in the afforestation project) and compared lizard population dynamics in plots with these structures and without. Survival of lizards in the plots with artificial trees was lower than survival in plots without artificial trees. Hatchlings dispersed into plots with artificial trees in a manner that indicated they perceived the quality of these plots as similar to the surrounding, unmanipulated landscape. Our results showed that local anthropogenic changes in habitat structure that seem relatively harmless may have a considerable negative effect beyond the immediate area of the perturbation because the disturbed habitat may become an ecological trap.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20337674     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01477.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  7 in total

1.  How the type of anthropogenic change alters the consequences of ecological traps.

Authors:  Robert J Fletcher; John L Orrock; Bruce A Robertson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Successional changes in trophic interactions support a mechanistic model of post-fire population dynamics.

Authors:  Annabel L Smith
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Translation of the ecological trap concept to glioma therapy: the cancer cell trap concept.

Authors:  Boudewijn van der Sanden; Florence Appaix; François Berger; Laurent Selek; Jean-Paul Issartel; Didier Wion
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.404

4.  Changing organisms in rapidly changing anthropogenic landscapes: the significance of the 'Umwelt'-concept and functional habitat for animal conservation.

Authors:  Hans Van Dyck
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 5.183

5.  Nest Predation Deviates from Nest Predator Abundance in an Ecologically Trapped Bird.

Authors:  Franck A Hollander; Hans Van Dyck; Gilles San Martin; Nicolas Titeux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Potential 'ecological traps' of restored landscapes: koalas Phascolarctos cinereus re-occupy a rehabilitated mine site.

Authors:  Romane H Cristescu; Peter B Banks; Frank N Carrick; Céline Frère
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Revealing microhabitat requirements of an endangered specialist lizard with LiDAR.

Authors:  Holly S Bradley; Michael D Craig; Adam T Cross; Sean Tomlinson; Michael J Bamford; Philip W Bateman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.