Literature DB >> 20337628

Multiple imputation approaches for the analysis of dichotomized responses in longitudinal studies with missing data.

Kaifeng Lu1, Liqiu Jiang, Anastasios A Tsiatis.   

Abstract

Often a binary variable is generated by dichotomizing an underlying continuous variable measured at a specific time point according to a prespecified threshold value. In the event that the underlying continuous measurements are from a longitudinal study, one can use the repeated-measures model to impute missing data on responder status as a result of subject dropout and apply the logistic regression model on the observed or otherwise imputed responder status. Standard Bayesian multiple imputation techniques (Rubin, 1987, in Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys) that draw the parameters for the imputation model from the posterior distribution and construct the variance of parameter estimates for the analysis model as a combination of within- and between-imputation variances are found to be conservative. The frequentist multiple imputation approach that fixes the parameters for the imputation model at the maximum likelihood estimates and construct the variance of parameter estimates for the analysis model using the results of Robins and Wang (2000, Biometrika 87, 113-124) is shown to be more efficient. We propose to apply (Kenward and Roger, 1997, Biometrics 53, 983-997) degrees of freedom to account for the uncertainty associated with variance-covariance parameter estimates for the repeated measures model.
© 2010, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20337628      PMCID: PMC3245577          DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01405.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  6 in total

1.  Accounting for dropout bias using mixed-effects models.

Authors:  C H Mallinckrodt; W S Clark; S R David
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2001 Feb-May       Impact factor: 1.051

2.  Repeated measures in clinical trials: analysis using mean summary statistics and its implications for design.

Authors:  L Frison; S J Pocock
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1992-09-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  MMRM vs. LOCF: a comprehensive comparison based on simulation study and 25 NDA datasets.

Authors:  Ohidul Siddiqui; H M James Hung; Robert O'Neill
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.051

4.  Should baseline be a covariate or dependent variable in analyses of change from baseline in clinical trials?

Authors:  Guanghan F Liu; Kaifeng Lu; Robin Mogg; Madhuja Mallick; Devan V Mehrotra
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood.

Authors:  M G Kenward; J H Roger
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Neuropeptide Y5 receptor antagonism does not induce clinically meaningful weight loss in overweight and obese adults.

Authors:  Ngozi Erondu; Ira Gantz; Bret Musser; Shailaja Suryawanshi; Madhuja Mallick; Carol Addy; Josee Cote; George Bray; Ken Fujioka; Harold Bays; Priscilla Hollander; Sandra M Sanabria-Bohórquez; WaiSi Eng; Bengt Långström; Richard J Hargreaves; H Donald Burns; Akio Kanatani; Takehiro Fukami; Douglas J MacNeil; Keith M Gottesdiener; John M Amatruda; Keith D Kaufman; Steven B Heymsfield
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 27.287

  6 in total
  4 in total

1.  Methods for Employing Information About Uncertainty of Ascertainment of Events in Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Yiming Chen; John Lawrence; H M James Hung; Norman Stockbridge
Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 1.778

2.  An R package for model fitting, model selection and the simulation for longitudinal data with dropout missingness.

Authors:  Cong Xu; Zheng Li; Yuan Xue; Lijun Zhang; Ming Wang
Journal:  Commun Stat Simul Comput       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 1.118

3.  Cause-specific mortality among HIV-infected individuals, by CD4(+) cell count at HAART initiation, compared with HIV-uninfected individuals.

Authors:  Nikolas Wada; Lisa P Jacobson; Mardge Cohen; Audrey French; John Phair; Alvaro Muñoz
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 4.177

4.  Outcome-sensitive multiple imputation: a simulation study.

Authors:  Evangelos Kontopantelis; Ian R White; Matthew Sperrin; Iain Buchan
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 4.615

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.