| Literature DB >> 20337570 |
Elspeth McCartney1, James Boyle, Sue Ellis, Susan Bannatyne, Mary Turnbull.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A manualized language therapy developed via a randomized controlled trial had proved efficacious in the short-term in developing expressive language for mainstream primary school children with persistent language impairment. This therapy had been delivered to a predetermined schedule by speech and language therapists or speech and language therapy assistants to children individually or in groups. However, this model of service delivery is no longer the most common model in UK schools, where indirect consultancy approaches with intervention delivered by school staff are often used. AIMS: A cohort study was undertaken to investigate whether the therapy was equally efficacious when delivered to comparable children by school staff, rather than speech and language therapists or speech and language therapy assistants. METHODS & PROCEDURES: Children in the cohort study were selected using the same criteria as in the randomized controlled trial, and the same manualized therapy was used, but delivered by mainstream school staff using a consultancy model common in the UK. Outcomes were compared with those of randomized controlled trial participants. OUTCOMES &Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20337570 DOI: 10.3109/13682820903560302
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Lang Commun Disord ISSN: 1368-2822 Impact factor: 3.020