Literature DB >> 20336644

Communicating with child patients in pediatric oncology consultations: a vignette study on child patients', parents', and survivors' communication preferences.

Marieke Zwaanswijk1, Kiek Tates, Sandra van Dulmen, Peter M Hoogerbrugge, Willem A Kamps, A Beishuizen, Jozien M Bensing.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the preferences of children with cancer, their parents, and survivors of childhood cancer regarding medical communication with child patients and variables associated with these preferences.
METHODS: Preferences regarding health-care provider empathy in consultations, and children's involvement in information exchange and medical decision making were investigated by means of vignettes. Vignettes are brief descriptions of hypothetical situations, in which important factors are systematically varied following an experimental design. In total, 1440 vignettes were evaluated by 34 children with cancer (aged 8-16), 59 parents, and 51 survivors (aged 8-16 at diagnosis, currently aged 10-30). Recruitment of participants took place in three Dutch university-based pediatric oncology centers. Data were analyzed by multilevel analyses.
RESULTS: Patients, parents, and survivors indicated the importance of health-care providers' empathy in 81% of the described situations. In most situations (70%), the three respondent groups preferred information about illness and treatment to be given to patients and parents simultaneously. Preferences regarding the amount of information provided to patients varied. The preference whether or not to shield patients from information was mainly associated with patients' age and emotionality. In most situations (71%), the three respondent groups preferred children to participate in medical decision making. This preference was mainly associated with patients' age.
CONCLUSIONS: To be able to adapt communication to parents' and patients' preferences, health-care providers should repeatedly assess the preferences of both groups. Future studies should investigate how health-care providers balance their communication between the sometimes conflicting preferences of patients and parents.
Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20336644     DOI: 10.1002/pon.1721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  15 in total

1.  Preferences for end-of-life care for children with cancer.

Authors:  Caprice Knapp; Kelly Komatz
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Information-sharing challenges between adolescents with cancer, their parents and health care providers: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Masoud Bahrami; Mahboobeh Namnabati; Fariborz Mokarian; Parastoo Oujian; Paul Arbon
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  What Adult Cancer Care Can Learn From Pediatrics.

Authors:  Sarah R Brand; Lucy Pickard; Jennifer W Mack; Leonard L Berry
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 3.840

4.  Adolescent cancer patients' perceived quality of cancer care: The roles of patient engagement and supporting independence.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Siembida; Nina S Kadan-Lottick; Kerry Moss; Keith M Bellizzi
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2018-04-10

5.  Care Partnerships: Toward Technology to Support Teens' Participation in Their Health Care.

Authors:  Matthew K Hong; Lauren Wilcox; Daniel Machado; Thomas A Olson; Stephen F Simoneaux
Journal:  Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst       Date:  2016-05-07

Review 6.  Communication in pediatric oncology: State of the field and research agenda.

Authors:  Bryan A Sisk; Jennifer W Mack; Rachel Ashworth; James DuBois
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.167

7.  Different corticosteroid induction regimens in children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: the SIRJIA mixed-methods feasibility study.

Authors:  Ashley P Jones; Dannii Clayton; Gloria Nkhoma; Frances C Sherratt; Matthew Peak; Simon R Stones; Louise Roper; Bridget Young; Flora McErlane; Tracy Moitt; Athimalaipet V Ramanan; Helen E Foster; Paula R Williamson; Samundeeswari Deepak; Michael W Beresford; Eileen M Baildam
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 4.014

8.  Do pediatric hematology/oncology (PHO) fellows receive communication training?

Authors:  Wilson File; Carma L Bylund; Jennifer Kesselheim; David Leonard; Patrick Leavey
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.167

9.  Persistently low peace of mind in parents of cancer patients: A five-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Bryan A Sisk; Shicheng Weng; Jennifer W Mack
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 3.167

10.  Parents' and Physicians' Perceptions of Children's Participation in Decision-making in Paediatric Oncology: A Quantitative Study.

Authors:  Michael Rost; Tenzin Wangmo; Felix Niggli; Karin Hartmann; Heinz Hengartner; Marc Ansari; Pierluigi Brazzola; Johannes Rischewski; Maja Beck-Popovic; Thomas Kühne; Bernice S Elger
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 1.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.