Literature DB >> 20336583

Inhibition of return exaggerates change blindness.

Daniel T Smith1, Thomas Schenk.   

Abstract

Peripheral cues trigger attention shifts, which facilitate perceptual processing and enhance visual awareness. However, this facilitation is superseded by an inhibition of return (IOR) effect, which biases attention away from the cued location. While the link between facilitatory effects of visual attention and awareness is well established, no study has reported negative effects of spatial cueing on visual awareness. This failure is puzzling, given the claim that attention is a necessary precondition for awareness. If attention is necessary for awareness, inhibiting attention should also inhibit awareness. This leads to a slightly counterintuitive prediction: Spatial cueing will inhibit awareness at long cue-target latencies. This study shows that subliminal peripheral cues exaggerate change blindness at long cue-change latencies, demonstrating that IOR can suppress visual awareness of changes and suggesting that IOR can directly affect the contents of consciousness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20336583     DOI: 10.1080/17470211003592621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  3 in total

1.  Attentional Modulation of Change Detection ERP Components by Peripheral Retro-Cueing.

Authors:  Paula Pazo-Álvarez; Adriana Roca-Fernández; Francisco-Javier Gutiérrez-Domínguez; Elena Amenedo
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  Mental State Attributions Mediate the Gaze Cueing Effect.

Authors:  Emma J Morgan; Megan Freeth; Daniel T Smith
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2018-02-19

3.  Rewards modulate saccade latency but not exogenous spatial attention.

Authors:  Stephen Dunne; Amanda Ellison; Daniel T Smith
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.