A new flavone C-glycoside from Clematis rehderiana.

A new flavone C-glycoside, isovitexin 6''-O-E-p-coumarate (1) and two known flavonoid glycosides--quercetin 3-O-beta-D-glucuronopyranoside (2) and isoorientin (3)--were isolated from an ethanol extract of aerial parts of Clematis rehderiana. Their structures were determined by spectroscopic methods. The antioxidant effects of the two flavone C-glycosides were evaluated by both the MTT and DPPH assays. Compound 1 showed potent activities against H2O2-induced impairment in PC12 cells within the concentration range tested, whereas compound 3 scavenged DPPH radical strongly, with an IC50 value of 13.5 microM.

Introduction

The genus Clematis (Ranunculaceae), which comprises about 300 span class="Chemical">pecies, is widespread throughout the World. About 147 species (93 endemic ones) are distributed in China, and 56 of these are distributed in Yunnan province [1,2]. It is reported that 77 Clematis species have been used in traditional Chinese medicine, of which 32 are found in Yunnan province [3]. The genus Clematis has many different pharmacological effects such as antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, antitumor, analgesic and diuretic functions [4]. Reports on the chemical components of genus Clematis have been scarce up to now and mainly refer to triterpenoid saponins [4,5,6]. In order to provide some knowledge for better usage of the Clematis resources, we have investigated the chemical constituents and antioxidant activity of Clematis rehderiana from Yunnan.

C. rehderiana (English common name: pan class="Species">cowslip scented clematis) is distributed in northwest Yunnan and used by local Tibetan people as a diuretic for eliminating dampness and cure indigestion, lumps in the abdomen and skin ulcers [7]. To the best of our knowledge, there are no reports about the chemical constituents of the species. We report here the isolation and characterization of one new and two known flavonoid glycosides from this plant, as well as antioxidant assay results for two of these compounds.

Results and Discussion

Structure Elucidation

The extract of C. rehderiana obtained with 90% pan class="Chemical">EtOH was then successively partitioned between H2O and EtOAc, followed by H2O and n-butanol. The n-butanol soluble fraction was separated by different chromatographic procedures to afford one new C-flavone glycoside 1 and two known flavonoid glycosides 2 and 3. Their structures were determined by examination of their spectral data and comparison of the data with reported literature values.

Compound 1 was obtained as a yellow powder. The molecular formula C30H26O12 was determined based on the high resolution FABMS data (m/z 577.1352 [M−H]‾, calcd: 577.1346). It gave a popan class="Chemical">sitive green coloration with 1% FeCl3 reagent suggesting it was a flavonoid. The 1H-NMR spectrum of 1 (Table 1) analyzed with the aid of HSQC and HMBC, showed two hydroxyl proton signals at δH 13.64 and δH 9.88; two one-proton singles at δH 6.54 and δH 6.63, attributed to H-8 and H-3, respectively; and two doublets at δH 7.91 (2H, d, J = 8.8 Hz, H-2′, 6′) and δH 6.98 (2H, d, J = 8.8 Hz, H-3′, 5′), suggesting that 1 was a 5,7,4′-trihydroxyflavone derivative. The 1H-NMR also showed sugar proton signals at δH 3.54 (2H, m), 3.70 (1H, m), 4.12 (1H, m), 4.34 (1H, dd, J = 6.0, 12 Hz), 4.56 (1H, dd, 1.52, 12.0 Hz), 4.92 (1H, d, J = 9.8 Hz) attributed to H-4″ and 5″; 3″; 2″; 6″; 6″ and the anomeric proton H-1″. The position of attachment of the sugar moiety to the flavonol skeleton was determined by HMBC experiments which showed long range coupling between the anomeric H-1″ (δ 4.92) and the C-5 at δ 161.7 and C-7 at δ 164.1. The 1H- and 13C-NMR spectroscopic data of the aglycone and sugar moieties of 1 were similar to those of isovitexin [8], except for the presence of nine additional carbon signals. These nine carbon signals are compatible with an E-p-coumaroyl moiety [9]. Two doublets at δH 6.85 (J = 8.6 Hz) and δH 7.53 (J = 8.6 Hz) were attributed to H-3'''/H-5''' and H-2'''/H-6'''of the E-p-coumaroyl moiety, respectively. Two other doublets (J = 15.9 Hz) at δH 6.37 and δH 7.62 were assigned to H-8''' and H-7''' of the p-coumaroyl moiety with E-configuration, respectively. The acylation of C-6″ with a p-coumaroyl unit was deduced from the downfield shift of CH2-6″ diastereomeric protons (~ + 1 ppm) and its 13C-resonance at 64.7 (+ 4 ppm). This evidence was confirmed by the HMBC correlation between δH 4.34, 4.56 (H-6″) and C-9''' at δ 167.5 Figure 1). Based on the spectral data, the structure of 1 was characterized as the new natural product isovitexin 6″-O-E-p-coumarate (Figure 2).

Table 1

1H- and 13C-NMR data of compounds 1 and 3 in DMSO (δ in ppm, J in Hz).*

Position	Compound 1		Compound 3
	δC	δH	δC
2	164.9		163.7
3	103.7	6.63 (s)	102.8
4	183.1		181.9
5	161.7		160.7
6	109.0		108.9
7	164.1		163.3
8	95.0	6.54 (s)	93.5
9	157.7		156.2
10	104.8		103.4
1′	122.5		121.5
2′	129.0	7.91 (d, 8.8)	113.3
3′	116.8	6.98 (d, 8.8)	145.8
4′	162.4		149.8
5′	116.8	6.98 (d, 8.8)	116.1
6′	129.0	7.91 (d, 8.8)	119.0
1″	74.9	4.92 (d, 9.8)	73.1
2″	72.3	4.12 (m)	70.2
3″	79.4	3.70 (m)	79.0
4″	71.3	3.54 (m)	70.7
5″	79.7	3.54 (m)	81.7
6″	64.7	4.56 (dd, 1.52, 12.0)	61.6
		4.34 (dd, 6.0, 12.0)
1'''	126.3
2'''	130.9	7.53 (d, 8.6)
3'''	116.6	6.85 (d, 8.6)
4'''	161.1
5'''	116.6	6.85 (d, 8.6)
6'''	130.9	7.53 (d, 8.6)
7'''	145.7	7.62 (d, 15.9)
8'''	114.9	6.37 (d, 15.9)
9'''	167.5

* 1H- and 13C-NMR spectra were obtained at 500 and 125 MHz, respectively

Figure 1

Key HMBC interactions of compound 1.

Figure 2

Structures of compounds 1–3.

Compound 2 was isolated as a yellow powder and had a molecular formula of C21H18O13, as determined by the high resolution FABMS (m/z 477.0669 [M−H]‾). The pan class="Chemical">1H-NMR showed two doublets at δH 6.83 (1H, d, J = 8.3 Hz, H-2′) and δH 7.42 (1H, br d, J = 8.2 Hz, H-6′) and one singlet at δH 8.05 (H-5′), suggesting (ortho)-hydroxylation of the B-ring, whereas 5,7-dihydroxylation of A-ring was duduced from two meta-coupled doublets that appeared as br-singlets at δH 6.39 (H-8) and δH 6.19 (H-6). The presence of a glucuronide moiety was suggested by the signals at δH 3.11–3.25 (3H, m, H-2″, 3″, 4″), δH 5.32 (H-1″) and a set of carbon signals at δC 102.4 (C-1″), 74.1 (C-2″), 76.4 (C-3″), 71.7 (C-4″), 74.7 (C-5″) and 171.7 (C-6″). The assignment of 1H- and 13C-NMR resonances for the glucuronide moiety were decided by HMBC and H–H COSY correlations, as well as comparison with the reported literature data [10]. The position of attachment of glucuronide moiety to the flavonol skeleton was determined by HMBC experiments which showed long range correlation (3J-coupling) between the anomeric proton H-1″ (δ 5.32) and the C-3 (δ 133.8). It was further confirmed by the absence of the characteristic H-3 proton singlet at around δH 6.7 associated with the C-3 in the C-ring [10]. Therefore, compound 2 was identified as quercetin 3-O-β-D-glucuronopyranoside (miquelianin; Figure 2). Finally, compound 3 was identified as isoorientin (Figure 2) by its spectral data (Table 1) and comparison of this data with the reported literature values [8].

1H- and pan class="Chemical">13C-NMR data of compounds 1 and 3 in DMSO (δ in ppm, J in Hz).*

* 1H- and pan class="Chemical">13C-NMR spectra were obtained at 500 and 125 MHz, respectively

Biological Activity

Since phenolics are characterized by antioxidant activities [11,12,13,14], two isolates were subjected to antioxidant activity expan class="Chemical">periments using both the MTT and DPPH assays (Table 2 and Table 3). Compound 1 showed potent activity against H2O2-induced impairment in PC12 cells within the concentration range tested (0.4 to 50 μM), whereas isoorientin (3) scavenged DPPH radical strongly, with an IC50 value of 13.5 μM. This indicated that compound 1 might be an indirectly acting antioxidant, while 3 might be a directly acting antioxidant.

Table 2

Antioxidant effects of compounds 1 and 3 against H2O2-induced impairment in PC12 cells.

Groups	Concentration (μM)	Viability (%)
Control		100
Model a		40.4 ± 4.6 ***
Edaravone b	10.0	35.3 ± 3.2
	2.0	43.2 ± 4.0
	0.4	46.1 ± 2.0 *
	0.08	44.3 ± 2.5
Compound 1	50.0	64.9 ± 9.8 ***
	10.0	53.7 ± 7.0 **
	2.0	46.1 ± 6.6
	0.4	47.6 ± 10.2
Compound 3	50.0	43.7 ± 4.8
	10.0	46.7 ± 5.2
	2.0	44.9 ± 6.8
	0.4	44.5 ± 6.2

Negative control; Positive control; n = 5; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 vs. model.

Table 3

Radical scavenging activities of compound 1 and 3 against DPPH.

Compounds	IC50 ( μM )
Edaravone a	26.0
1	> 100
3	13.5

Positive control.

Antioxidant effects of compounds 1 and 3 against H2O2-induced impairment in pan class="CellLine">PC12 cells.

Negative control; Popan class="Chemical">sitive control; n = 5; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 vs. model.

Popan class="Chemical">sitive control.

Experimental

General

Optical rotations were measured with a JASCO DIP-370 digital polarimeter in MeOH solutions. IR span class="Chemical">pectra were measured on a Bio-Rad FTS-135 infrared spectrometer with KBr pellets. UV spectra were obtained with a Shimadzu UV-2401PC spectrometer. Mass spectra were measured on a VG Auto Spec-3000 spectrometer. NMR spectra were recorded on a DRX-500 NMR spectrometer with TMS as internal standard. Silica gel (200-300 mesh) for column chromatography and precoated TLC plates (Si gel G) were purchased from the Qingdao Marine Chemical Factory (Qingdao, P. R. China). Reversed-phase C18 silica gel for column chromatography were obtained from Merck. Sephadex LH-20 for column chromatography was purchased from Amersham Biosciences.

Plant material

Aerial parts of Clematis rehderiana was collected from Lijian in Yunnan Province, China, in August 2005. A voucher span class="Chemical">pecimen (KUN0816301) is stored at the herbarium of Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Extraction and isolation

The air-dried aerial parts of C. rehderiana (3 kg) were ground and extracted four times with 90% pan class="Chemical">EtOH (8 L each time) at room temperature. After removal of the solvent, the residue was suspended in water (2 L) and then extracted successively with petroleum ether (PE), EtOAc and n-butanol (4 × 2L each). The n-butanol extract was subjected to column chromatography (CC) over macroporous resin D101 eluting with EtOH-H2O (0%–95%) and afforded five fractions Fr. I–V. Fr. III (18.1 g) was subjected to CC over silica gel (100 g) and eluted with CHCl3/MeOH 20:1→ 9:1→ 4:1 → 7:3 and EtOH to give 10 subfractions (Fr. III1 – Fr. III10). Fr. III5 was further isolated by repeated vacuum liquid chromatography (VLC) over RP-18 and eluted with MeOH-H2O (0% to 50%) to afford compounds 2 (4 mg) and 3 (50 mg). Fr. IV (3.9 g) was subjected to CC over silica gel (60 g) and eluted with CHCl3/MeOH 20:1→ 9:1→ 7:3 to give 14 subfractions (Fr. IV1 – Fr. III14). Fr. IV8 was further fractionated by repeated CC over SephadexLH-20 and eluted with MeOH-CHCl3 and MeOH to afford compound 1 (12 mg).

Compound 1: = +32.9 (c 0.76, MeOH); IR (KBr): 3,420, 2,920, 1,720 cm-1; pan class="Chemical">1H- and 13C-NMR see Table 1. HRFABMS (neg): m/z 577.1352 [M-H]−, calcd: 577.1346.

Compound 2: = −8.6 (c 0.58, MeOH); UV (pan class="Chemical">MeOH) λmax (log ε) 404, 270, 210 nm; IR (KBr): 3,408, 2,922, 1,653, 1,604; HRFABMS (neg): m/z 477.0669 [M-H]−, calcd: 477.0669; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d) δ: 12.35 (1H, br s 5-OH), 8.05 (1H, s, H-5′), 7.42 (1H, br d, J = 8.2 Hz, H-6′), 6.83 (1H, d, J = 8.3 Hz, H-2′), 6.39 (1H, br s, H-8), 6.19 (1H, br s, H-6), 5.32 (1H, d, J = 7.0 Hz, H-1″), 3.39 1H, m, H-5″), 3.11-3.25 (3H, m, H-2″, 3″, 4″); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d) δ: 157.2 (C-2), 133.8 (C-3), 177.4 (C-4), 161.0 (C-5), 98.9 (C-6), 164.5 (C-7), 93.7 (C-8), 156.4 (C-9), 103.7 (C-10), 120.6 (C-1′), 115.3 (C-2′), 144.8 (C-3′), 148.5 (C-4′), 117.5 (C-5′), 120.9 (C-6′), 102.4 (C-1″), 74.1 (C-2″), 76.4 (C-3″), 71.7 (C-4″), 74.7 (C-5″), 171.7 (C-6″).

Antioxidant assays

The antioxidant assay against H2O2-induced impairment in pan class="CellLine">PC12 cells was conducted according to the reported protocol [14]. Briefly, PC12 cells were seeded into 96-well plates in RPMI 1640 medium with 10% characterized Newborn Bovine Serum. Twenty-four hours later, different concentrations of compounds 1 and 3 together with freshly prepared H2O2 were added and incubation continued for 1 hour. Then MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) solution was added and the incubation continued for 4 hours. Finally, solution (100 μL) containing 5% iso-butanol, 10% SDS (Sigma) and 0.004% HCl was added. The mixtures were kept overnight and the index of cell viability (% of control) was calculated by measuring the optical density of the color produced by MTT dye reduction with a microplate reader at 570 nm.

DPPH radical-scavenging activity assays were pan class="Chemical">performed according to our previously reported procedures [11]. Each compound (100 μL) at five different concentrations was added to DPPH solution (100 μL). The absorbance was measured with a microplate reader at 517 nm after 30 min of reaction at 37 °C. IC50 values denote the concentration of sample required to scavenge 50% DPPH free radicals.

Conclusions

A new flavone C-glycoside, isovitexin 6″-O-pan class="Chemical">E-p-coumarate (1) and two known flavonoid glycosides—quercetin 3-O-β-D-glucuronopyranoside (2) and isoorientin (3)—were isolated from an ethanol extract of aerial parts of C. rehderiana. The antioxidant effects experiments of these compounds by both the MTT and DPPH assays suggested that flavone glycosides were major constituents with antioxidant activities in this plant.