Literature DB >> 20334740

The role of surgeons in identifying emerging technologies for health technology assessment.

Tania Stafinski1, Leigh-Ann Topfer, Ken Zakariasen, Devidas Menon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Health technology assessment (HTA) is a tool intended to help policy-makers decide which technologies to fund. However, given the proliferation of new technologies, it is not possible to undertake an HTA of each one before it becomes funded. Consequently, "horizon-scanning" processes have been developed to identify emerging technologies that are likely to have a substantial impact on clinical practice. Although the importance of physicians in the adoption of new technologies is well recognized, their role in horizon scanning in Canada has been limited. The purpose of this project was to pilot an approach to engage physicians, specifically surgeons, in provincial horizon-scanning activities.
METHODS: We invited 18 surgeons from Alberta's 2 medical schools to a horizon-scanning workshop to solicit their views on emerging technologies expected to impact surgical practice within the next 5 years and/or the importance of different attributes or characteristics of new technologies.
RESULTS: Surgeons, regardless of specialty, identified developments designed to enhance existing minimally invasive surgical techniques, such as endoscopic, robotic and image-guided surgery. Several nonsurgical areas, including molecular genetics and nano technology, were also identified. Of the 13 technology attributes discussed, safety or risk, effectiveness and feasibility were rated as most important. Lastly, participating surgeons expressed an interest in becoming further involved in local HTA initiatives.
CONCLUSION: Surgeons, as adopters and users of health technologies, represent an important and accessible information source for identifying emerging technologies for HTA. A more formal, ongoing relationship between the government, HTA and surgeons may help to optimize the use of HTA resources.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20334740      PMCID: PMC2845954     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Surg        ISSN: 0008-428X            Impact factor:   2.089


  10 in total

1.  The dynamics of innovation in minimally invasive therapy.

Authors:  A C Gelijns; A M Fendrick
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  The introduction of new technology.

Authors:  James P Waddell
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 3.  Adoption of new surgical technology.

Authors:  Charles B Wilson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-01-14

Review 4.  Innovation in surgery: a historical perspective.

Authors:  Daniel J Riskin; Michael T Longaker; Michael Gertner; Thomas M Krummel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  The challenge of emerging surgical technology: the College can help.

Authors:  Richard R Sabo
Journal:  Bull Am Coll Surg       Date:  2002-12

6.  Linking evidence from health technology assessments to policy and decision making: the Alberta model.

Authors:  Henry Z Borowski; Jon Brehaut; David Hailey
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.188

7.  Health technology assessment in Canada: 20 years strong?

Authors:  Devidas Menon; Tania Stafinski
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.725

Review 8.  A review of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) for intra-abdominal surgery: experimental models, techniques, and applicability to the clinical setting.

Authors:  Eliana Della Flora; Thomas G Wilson; Ian J Martin; Nicholas A O'Rourke; Guy J Maddern
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Which are the best information sources for identifying emerging health care technologies? An international Delphi survey.

Authors:  G Robert; J Gabbay; A Stevens
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.188

10.  The rate of adoption of new procedures among physicians. The impact of specialty and practice characteristics.

Authors:  M P Freiman
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 2.983

  10 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  The Business Engineering Surgical Technologies (BEST) teaching method: incubating talents for surgical innovation.

Authors:  V de Ruijter; P Halvax; B Dallemagne; L Swanström; J Marescaux; S Perretta
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Diffusion of robotic-assisted laparoscopic technology across specialties: a national study from 2008 to 2013.

Authors:  Yen-Yi Juo; Aditya Mantha; Ahmad Abiri; Anne Lin; Erik Dutson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Network analysis of surgical innovation: Measuring value and the virality of diffusion in robotic surgery.

Authors:  George Garas; Isabella Cingolani; Pietro Panzarasa; Ara Darzi; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Scanning the horizon: a systematic literature review of methodologies.

Authors:  Philip Hines; Li Hiu Yu; Richard H Guy; Angela Brand; Marisa Papaluca-Amati
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.