| Literature DB >> 20334653 |
Yajuan Su1, Lei Zheng, Qian Wang, Weiqi Li, Zhen Cai, Shilong Xiong, Jie Bao.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Circulating bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) have been reported to participate in tumor angiogenesis and growth; however, the role of circulating EPCs in tumor progression is controversial. The role of circulating EPCs in ovarian cancer progression and angiogenesis has not yet been investigated.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20334653 PMCID: PMC2857826 DOI: 10.1186/1756-9966-29-27
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Clin Cancer Res ISSN: 0392-9078
Figure 1(A) Representative flow cytometric analysis from a patient with ovarian cancer. Left: flow cytometry gating. Middle: isotype negative control for flow-cytometry. Right: representative flow cytometric analysis for determining the number of CD34/VEGFR2 double-positive cells with a value of 1.61%. (B) Comparison of circulating EPC levels in ovarian cancer patients and healthy subjects. Data are expressed as mean ± SE (**P < 0.01, *P < 0.05). (C) Kaplan-Meier overall survival curve of patients with ovarian cancer according to pre-treatment circulating EPCs numbers (P = 0.012). The cutoff value between low and high pre-treatment EPC levels was set at 945 EPCs/ml of peripheral blood (median value).
Clinical characteristics and circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) levels of ovarian cancer patients
| Clinical characteristic | Patients (n) | EPCs (per ml) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | NS | ||
| <43 years old | 17 | 1154 ± 93.7 | |
| ≥43 years old | 25 | 1205 ± 178.5 | |
| Residual tumor size | 0.029 | ||
| <2 cm | 22 | 523 ± 92.6 | |
| ≥2 cm | 8 | 875 ± 192.6 | |
| FIGO stage | 0.034 | ||
| I--II | 8 | 1023 ± 104.2 | |
| III--IV | 34 | 1450 ± 206.5 | |
| Histological subtype | NS | ||
| Serous | 23 | 1165 ± 254.6 | |
| Mucinous | 13 | 1187 ± 223.7 | |
| Endometrioid | 6 | 1235 ± 198.4 | |
| Therapy | NS | ||
| Chemotherapy | 12 | 783.4 ± 162.5 | |
| Surgery | 30 | 605 ± 147.2 |
FIGO, Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology; NS, not significant. Data are expressed as mean ± SE.
Figure 2Pre-treatment and post-treatment relative gene expression levels of (A) CD34 and (B) VEGFR2 were determined by real-time RT-PCR. *P = 0.013, versus healthy subjects.
Figure 3Pre-treatment and post-treatment plasma levels of (A) VEGF (pg/ml) and (B) MMP-9 (ng/ml) in patients with ovarian cancer and healthy controls. (C) Significant correlation was found between plasma VEGF and circulating EPC levels in patients with ovarian cancer (P = 0.0043, r = 0.883). (D) Significant correlation was found between plasma MMP-9 and circulating EPC levels for patients with ovarian cancer (P = 0.0027, r = 0.865).