Literature DB >> 20333524

Bone marrow examination: a prospective survey on factors associated with pain.

Christian Degen1, Susanne Christen, Alicia Rovo, Alois Gratwohl.   

Abstract

Bone marrow examination (BME) represents an essential tool for diagnosis and monitoring of haematological disorders. It remains associated with morbidity and discomfort; repeat examinations are frequent. We made a single-centre prospective survey on 700 BME between July 2007 and July 2008 with a structured anonymized questionnaire for patients undergoing and physicians performing BME, which includes at our institution always aspiration and trephine. All procedures were performed according to institutionalised standard operating procedures; 412 patients' (58.9%) and 554 physicians' (79.1%) questionnaires were returned. Pain was the only procedure-related complication; no pain was reported in 149 (36.7%), bearable pain in 242 (59.6%) and unbearable pain in 15 (3.7%) cases. Premedication associated complications were reported by 110 (32.7%) of the 336 (65.4%) patients with premedication before BME. None of these were > WHO grade 2; most frequently reported were tiredness (76 patients; 22.6%), dizziness (19 patients; 5.7%) and nausea (15 patients; 4.5%). Only two factors were significantly associated with unbearable pain: "pain during prior BME" (seven of 94 with versus one of 198 without previous pain; p < 0.01) and "information before BME" (four of 11 without versus 12 of 372 with adequate information before BME; p < 0.01). Inadequate information at any time showed a trend towards an association with unbearable pain (p = 0.08). No other factor was associated with unbearable pain. Good and adequate information appears to be the best way to reduce pain, even for a future BME.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20333524     DOI: 10.1007/s00277-010-0934-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Hematol        ISSN: 0939-5555            Impact factor:   3.673


  11 in total

1.  Pain and anxiety during bone marrow aspiration/biopsy: Comparison of ratings among patients versus health-care professionals.

Authors:  Y Lidén; N Olofsson; O Landgren; E Johansson
Journal:  Eur J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 2.398

2.  Using a powered bone marrow biopsy system results in shorter procedures, causes less residual pain to adult patients, and yields larger specimens.

Authors:  James R Berenson; Ori Yellin; Brent Blumenstein; Deanna Bojanower; Jonathan Croopnick; David Aboulafia; Gargi Upadhyaya; Cathy Spadaccini
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 2.644

3.  Bone Marrow Aspiration Does Not Induce a Measurable Pain Response Compared to Sham Procedure.

Authors:  Aileen L Rowland; Cristobal Navas de Solis; Mauricio A Lepiz; Kevin J Cummings; Ashlee E Watts
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-10-01

4.  Comparison of Bone Marrow Biopsy Specimens Obtained Using a Motorized Device and Manual Biopsy Systems.

Authors:  Catherine A Glennon; Janet M Woodroof; Suman Kambhampati; Alexis C Battershell; Serena R O'Connor; Kiley B Roberts
Journal:  Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec

5.  Pain assessment and factors influencing pain during bone marrow aspiration: A prospective study.

Authors:  Nicolas Gendron; Sara Zia Chahabi; Géraldine Poenou; Nadia Rivet; Tiphaine Belleville-Rolland; Pierre Lemaire; Antoine Escuret; Michèle Ciaudo; Emmanuel Curis; Pascale Gaussem; Virginie Siguret; Luc Darnige
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Combined Oral Fentanyl Citrate and Midazolam as Premedication for Bone Marrow Aspiration and Biopsy in Patients with Hematological Malignancies: A Randomized, Controlled and Patient-Blinded Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Claudio Cerchione; Giovanni Martinelli; Marco Picardi; Novella Pugliese; Davide Nappi; Aniello Casoria; Angela Gravetti; Delia Cangini; Maria Benedetta Giannini; Sonia Ronconi; Giorgia Simonetti; Andrea Ghelli Luserna Di Rorà; Ugo De Giorgi; Mattia Altini; Sara Bravaccini; Ilaria Santoriello; Cristiano Minucci; Fabrizio Pane; Vincenzo Martinelli
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 7.  Impact of the Process Variables on the Yield of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells from Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate.

Authors:  Madhan Jeyaraman; Shiva Kumar Bingi; Sathish Muthu; Naveen Jeyaraman; Rathinavelpandian Perunchezhian Packkyarathinam; Rajni Ranjan; Shilpa Sharma; Saurabh Kumar Jha; Manish Khanna; Sree Naga Sowndary Rajendran; Ramya Lakshmi Rajendran; Prakash Gangadaran
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-29

8.  Comparison of a powered bone marrow biopsy device with a manual system: results of a prospective randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Christoph Marcus Bucher; Thomas Lehmann; André Tichelli; Alexander Tzankov; Stephan Dirnhofer; Jakob Passweg; Alicia Rovó
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 9.  Strategies of pain reduction during the bone marrow biopsy.

Authors:  Nikolaj Hjortholm; Emil Jaddini; Kazimierz Hałaburda; Emilian Snarski
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 3.673

Review 10.  Practical Guide to Bone Marrow Sampling for Suspected Myelodysplastic Syndromes.

Authors:  Jean A Ridgeway; Sara Tinsley; Sandra E Kurtin
Journal:  J Adv Pract Oncol       Date:  2017-01-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.