Literature DB >> 20333322

Assortative matching among same-sex and different-sex couples in the United States, 1990-2000.

Christine R Schwartz1, Nikki L Graf.   

Abstract

Same-sex couples are less likely to be homogamous than different-sex couples on a variety of characteristics including race/ethnicity, age, and education. This study confirms results from previous studies which used 1990 U.S. census data and extends previous analyses to examine changes from 1990 to 2000. We find that same-sex male cohabitors are generally the least likely to resemble one another, followed by same-sex female cohabitors, different-sex cohabitors, and different-sex married couples. Despite estimated growth in the numbers of same-sex couples in the population and the increasing acceptance of same-sex unions, we find little evidence of diminishing differences in the resemblance of same- and different-sex couples between 1990 and 2000, with the possible exception of educational homogamy.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20333322      PMCID: PMC2843104          DOI: 10.4054/demres.2009.21.28

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Demogr Res


  8 in total

Review 1.  Demographics of the gay and lesbian population in the United States: evidence from available systematic data sources.

Authors:  D Black; G Gates; S Sanders; L Taylor
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2000-05

2.  An empirical analysis of the matching patterns of same-sex and opposite-sex couples.

Authors:  Lisa K Jepsen; Christopher A Jepsen
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2002-08

3.  Pathways to educational homogamy in marital and cohabiting unions.

Authors:  Christine R Schwartz
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2010-08

4.  The demographics of same-sex marriages in Norway and Sweden.

Authors:  Gunnar Andersson; Turid Noack; Ane Seierstad; Harald Weedon-Fekjaer
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2006-02

5.  Trends in educational assortative marriage from 1940 to 2003.

Authors:  Christine R Schwartz; Robert D Mare
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2005-11

6.  Gay and lesbian partnership: evidence from California.

Authors:  Christopher Carpenter; Gary J Gates
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2008-08

7.  Young Adult Relationship Values at the Intersection of Gender and Sexuality.

Authors:  Ann Meier; Kathleen E Hull; Timothy A Ortyl
Journal:  J Marriage Fam       Date:  2009-08-01

8.  Age preferences for same- and opposite-sex partners.

Authors:  A F Hayes
Journal:  J Soc Psychol       Date:  1995-04
  8 in total
  10 in total

1.  A Population-Based Study of Alcohol Use in Same-Sex and Different-Sex Unions.

Authors:  Corinne Reczek; Hui Liu; Russell Spiker
Journal:  J Marriage Fam       Date:  2014-06-01

2.  Gender and the Stability of Same-Sex and Different-Sex Relationships Among Young Adults.

Authors:  Kara Joyner; Wendy Manning; Ryan Bogle
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2017-12

3.  Assortativity and Mixing by Sexual Behaviors and Sociodemographic Characteristics in Young Adult Heterosexual Dating Partnerships.

Authors:  Talía Malagón; Ann Burchell; Mariam El-Zein; Pierre-Paul Tellier; François Coutlée; Eduardo L Franco
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.830

4.  Comparing same- and different-sex relationship dynamics: Experiences of young adults in Taiwan.

Authors:  Zhiyong Lin; Wei-Hsin Yu; Kuo-Hsien Su
Journal:  Demogr Res       Date:  2019-03-05

5.  Health and Health Behavior Concordance between Spouses in Same-Sex and Different-Sex Marriages.

Authors:  Giuseppina Valle Holway; Debra Umberson; Rachel Donnelly
Journal:  Soc Curr       Date:  2017-10-05

6.  Same-Sex and Different-Sex Cohabiting Couple Relationship Stability.

Authors:  Wendy D Manning; Susan L Brown; J Bart Stykes
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2016-08

7.  The Qualities of Same-Sex and Different-Sex Couples in Young Adulthood.

Authors:  Kara Joyner; Wendy Manning; Barbara Prince
Journal:  J Marriage Fam       Date:  2018-10-10

8.  Spousal associations of serum metabolomic profiles by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Authors:  Karema Al Rashid; Neil Goulding; Amy Taylor; Mary Ann Lumsden; Deborah A Lawlor; Scott M Nelson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Patterns of sexual mixing with respect to social, health and sexual characteristics among heterosexual couples in England: analyses of probability sample survey data.

Authors:  P Prah; A J Copas; C H Mercer; A Nardone; A M Johnson
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 2.451

10.  Spouses' faces are similar but do not become more similar with time.

Authors:  Pin Pin Tea-Makorn; Michal Kosinski
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.