Literature DB >> 20332739

Comparison of two ketamine-propofol dosing regimens for sedation during interventional radiology procedures.

I A Erden1, A G Pamuk, S B Akinci, A Koseoglu, U Aypar.   

Abstract

AIM: Invasive diagnostic and therapeutic interventional radiological procedures can be painful and anxiety provoking. The combination of propofol and ketamine may minimize the need for supplemental opioid analgesics and has the potential to provide better sedation with less toxicity than either drug alone.
METHODS: Seventy-two consenting ASA physical status I- III patients undergoing interventional radiological procedures under sedation were recruited according to a randomized, double-blind, institutional review board-approved protocol. Patients were randomized to two groups. Group 1 received propofol 0.5 mg.kg-1 + ketamine 0.5 mg.kg-1, and group 2 received propofol 0.5 mg.kg-1 + ketamine 0.25 mg.kg-1 intravenously.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to demographic characteristics and the duration of the interventional radiological procedure, hemodynamic data, oxygen saturation, or side-effects. However, the mean propofol dosage was higher in group 2 (33.7+/-39.3 mg) than in group 1 (15.5+/-22.3 mg), and the number of oversedated patients (sedation score >4) was higher in group 2 (19 patients) than group 1 (6 patients) (P=0.019 and P=0.001, respectively). Sixteen patients (44%) in group 1 and 21 (58%) patients in group 2 required additional propofol during the procedure. The mean recovery times were 12.1+/-1 minutes in group 1 and 13.8+/-0.8 minutes in group 2 (P>0.05).
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the two different dosages of ketamine coadministered with propofol for sedation during interventional radiological procedures showed no clinically significant hemodynamic changes or side effects, and both appeared to prompt early recovery time. We recommend propofol 0.5 mg.kg-1 + ketamine 0.5 mg.kg-1 for sedation and analgesia during interventional radiological procedures, rather than propofol 0.5 mg.kg-1 + ketamine 0.25 mg.kg-1 because the former combination is associated with reduced rescue propofol requirements and therefore less oversedation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20332739

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol        ISSN: 0375-9393            Impact factor:   3.051


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of ketamine and ketofol for deep sedation and analgesia in children undergoing laser procedure.

Authors:  Marija Stevic; Nina Ristic; Ivana Budic; Nebojsa Ladjevic; Branislav Trifunovic; Ivan Rakic; Marko Majstorovic; Ivana Burazor; Dusica Simic
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Pediatric sedation in vascular malformations interventions by a non-anesthesiologist-feasibility and safety.

Authors:  Giora Weiser; Itai Gross; Anthony Verstandig; Adam Farkas
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Patient safety during procedural sedation using capnography monitoring: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rhodri Saunders; Michel M R F Struys; Richard F Pollock; Michael Mestek; Jenifer R Lightdale
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Comparison of haemodynamic changes between propofol and ketofol as induction agents in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries under general anaesthesia.

Authors:  Vikasini Raman; Sivakumar Segaran; T Ramyavel; Sagiev Koshy George; Mamie Zachariah
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2022-01-13

5.  [Remifentanil-ketamine vs. propofol-ketamine for sedation in pediatric patients undergoing colonoscopy: A randomized clinical trial].

Authors:  Feride Karacaer; Ebru Biricik; Murat Ilgınel; Çağatay Küçükbingöz; Mehmet Ağın; Gökhan Tümgör; Yasemin Güneş; Dilek Özcengiz
Journal:  Braz J Anesthesiol       Date:  2018-09-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.