Literature DB >> 20332321

Lack of correlation between epidermal growth factor receptor status and response to Panitumumab monotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.

J Randolph Hecht1, Edith Mitchell, Marcus A Neubauer, Howard A Burris, Paul Swanson, Timothy Lopez, Glenn Buchanan, Maureen Reiner, Jennifer Gansert, Jordan Berlin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Panitumumab, a fully human anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody, is approved as monotherapy for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. We evaluated the association of tumor EGFR expression levels with outcomes in patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Two phase II, multicenter, single-arm, open-label studies enrolled chemorefractory patients with tumors expressing low/negative (1-9%/<1%; Low/Negative EGFR study) or high (> or =10%; High EGFR study) levels of EGFR. Patients received panitumumab 6 mg/kg every two weeks until disease progression or intolerance. End points included objective response rate (per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Exploratory analyses by tumor KRAS status were carried out.
RESULTS: A total of 203 patients (Low/Negative EGFR) and 185 patients (High EGFR) enrolled in the studies. The overall response rate was 5.7% [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 2.6-10.5] in patients with low/negative EGFR and 4.2% (95% CI, 1.6-9.0) in patients with high EGFR; the response rate at week 16 was 4% in both studies (all partial responses). Median PFS times were 8.1 weeks (95% CI, 7.1-12.6), 8.1 weeks (95% CI, 7.4-11.1), and 7.3 weeks (95% CI, 7.1-7.6) in patients with negative, low, and high levels of EGFR expression, respectively. PFS and OS were longer in patients with wild-type KRAS than those with mutant KRAS. As expected, most adverse events were skin related.
CONCLUSIONS: These studies confirm previous reports that tumor EGFR expression levels are not associated with efficacy with an anti-EGFR antibody and that anti-EGFR antibody therapy should be limited to those patients whose tumors express wild-type KRAS. Copyright 2010 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20332321     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  41 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic perspectives on the clinical drug development of panitumumab.

Authors:  Bing-Bing Yang; Peggy Lum; Alin Chen; Rosalin Arends; Lorin Roskos; Brian Smith; Juan José Pérez Ruixo
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  The status of targeted agents in the setting of neoadjuvant radiation therapy in locally advanced rectal cancers.

Authors:  Rob Glynne-Jones; Maher Hadaki; Mark Harrison
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2013-09

3.  Integrating anti-EGFR therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Sigurdis Haraldsdottir; Tanios Bekaii-Saab
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2013-09

Review 4.  Molecular markers predictive of chemotherapy response in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Stacey Shiovitz; William M Grady
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2015-02

5.  Development and characterization of 89Zr-labeled panitumumab for immuno-positron emission tomographic imaging of the epidermal growth factor receptor.

Authors:  Albert J Chang; Ravindra A De Silva; Suzanne E Lapi
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.488

6.  Expression of EGFR, HER2, phosphorylated ERK and phosphorylated MEK in colonic neoplasms of familial adenomatous polyposis patients.

Authors:  Jayson Wang; James Hollingshead; Nabil El-Masry; Donna Horncastle; Ian Talbot; Ian Tomlinson; Malcolm R Alison; Mona El-Bahrawy
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2012-09

Review 7.  Panitumumab: a review of its use in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  Biomarker use in colorectal cancer therapy.

Authors:  Robin K Kelley; Grace Wang; Alan P Venook
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 11.908

9.  Biweekly cetuximab plus irinotecan as second-line chemotherapy for patients with irinotecan-refractory and KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer according to epidermal growth factor receptor expression status.

Authors:  Myoung Joo Kang; Yong Sang Hong; Kyu-pyo Kim; Sun Young Kim; Ji Yeon Baek; Min-Hee Ryu; Jae-Lyun Lee; Heung Moon Chang; Mi-Jung Kim; Hee Jin Chang; Yoon-Koo Kang; Tae Won Kim
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2011-06-25       Impact factor: 3.850

10.  Direct and immune mediated antibody targeting of ERBB receptors in a colorectal cancer cell-line panel.

Authors:  Shazad Q Ashraf; Angela M Nicholls; Jennifer L Wilding; Triantafyllia G Ntouroupi; Neil J Mortensen; Walter F Bodmer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.