Literature DB >> 20332035

Learning Bayesian networks from survival data using weighting censored instances.

Ivan Stajduhar1, Bojana Dalbelo-Basić.   

Abstract

Different survival data pre-processing procedures and adaptations of existing machine-learning techniques have been successfully applied to numerous fields in clinical medicine. Zupan et al. (2000) proposed handling censored survival data by assigning distributions of outcomes to shortly observed censored instances. In this paper, we applied their learning technique to two well-known procedures for learning Bayesian networks: a search-and-score hill-climbing algorithm and a constraint-based conditional independence algorithm. The method was thoroughly tested in a simulation study and on the publicly available clinical dataset GBSG2. We compared it to learning Bayesian networks by treating censored instances as event-free and to Cox regression. The results on model performance suggest that the weighting approach performs best when dealing with intermediate censoring. There is no significant difference between the model structures learnt using either the weighting approach or by treating censored instances as event-free, regardless of censoring. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20332035     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2010.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Inform        ISSN: 1532-0464            Impact factor:   6.317


  6 in total

1.  A Naive Bayes machine learning approach to risk prediction using censored, time-to-event data.

Authors:  Julian Wolfson; Sunayan Bandyopadhyay; Mohamed Elidrisi; Gabriela Vazquez-Benitez; David M Vock; Donald Musgrove; Gediminas Adomavicius; Paul E Johnson; Patrick J O'Connor
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Adapting machine learning techniques to censored time-to-event health record data: A general-purpose approach using inverse probability of censoring weighting.

Authors:  David M Vock; Julian Wolfson; Sunayan Bandyopadhyay; Gediminas Adomavicius; Paul E Johnson; Gabriela Vazquez-Benitez; Patrick J O'Connor
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 6.317

3.  Risk Prediction Using Bayesian Networks: An Immunotherapy Case Study in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Alind Gupta; Paul Arora; Darren Brenner; Jacqueline Vanderpuye-Orgle; Devon J Boyne; Mark Edmondson-Jones; Elena Parkhomenko; Warren Stevens; Shaan Dudani; Daniel Y C Heng; Samuel Wagner; John Borrill; Elise Wu
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2021-03

4.  Learning rule sets from survival data.

Authors:  Łukasz Wróbel; Adam Gudyś; Marek Sikora
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  A novel dynamic Bayesian network approach for data mining and survival data analysis.

Authors:  Ali Sheidaei; Abbas Rahimi Foroushani; Kimiya Gohari; Hojjat Zeraati
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 3.298

6.  A prognostic Bayesian network that makes personalized predictions of poor prognostic outcome post resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Alison Bradley; Robert Van der Meer; Colin J McKay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.