Literature DB >> 2033182

Effect of mitral regurgitation on pulmonary venous velocities derived from transesophageal echocardiography color-guided pulsed Doppler imaging.

R Castello1, A C Pearson, P Lenzen, A J Labovitz.   

Abstract

The effect of mitral regurgitation on pulmonary venous flow velocity was studied in 66 patients undergoing transesophageal echocardiography. Nine patients were studied intraoperatively before and after surgery, so that 75 pulmonary venous flow tracings were analyzed. Fifty-four patients had no significant (0 to 1+) mitral regurgitation and 21 had significant (2 to 3+) mitral regurgitation. Comparison of both groups revealed significant differences in the pulmonary venous flow pattern. In patients with no significant mitral regurgitation, the peak systolic velocity was higher (55 +/- 16 vs. -4 +/- 16 cm/s; p less than 0.0001) and the peak diastolic velocity was lower (43 +/- 13 vs. 59 +/- 17 cm/s; p less than 0.01) when compared with values in patients with significant mitral regurgitation. Consequently, the peak systolic/diastolic velocity ratio was significantly higher in the patients without significant mitral regurgitation (1.4 +/- 0.5 vs. 0.4 +/- 1.3; p less than 0.0001). The same trend was noted with respect to the systolic and diastolic velocity integrals. As the degree of mitral regurgitation increased, the peak diastolic velocity and diastolic velocity integral increased, whereas the peak systolic velocity and systolic velocity integral decreased. In patients with severe mitral regurgitation, the systolic flow became reversed (retrograde). The sensitivity of reversed systolic flow for severe mitral regurgitation was 90% (9 of 10), the specificity was 100% (65 of 65), the positive predictive value was 100% (9 of 9), the negative predictive value was 98% (65 of 66) and the predictive accuracy was 99% (74 of 75).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2033182     DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(91)90638-p

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  6 in total

Review 1.  Doppler echocardiographic assessment of valvar regurgitation.

Authors:  James D Thomas
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Assessment of functional anatomy of the mitral valve in patients with mitral regurgitation with cine magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with transesophageal echocardiography and surgical results.

Authors:  A Stork; O Franzen; H Ruschewski; C Detter; K Müllerleile; P M Bansmann; G Adam; G K Lund
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Left atrial function in congestive heart failure: assessment by transmitral and pulmonary vein Doppler.

Authors:  G Y Xie; M R Berk; A J Fiedler; P M Sapin; M D Smith
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1998-02

Review 4.  Analysis of left ventricular diastolic function.

Authors:  K Yamamoto; M M Redfield; R A Nishimura
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Assessment of severity of mechanical prosthetic mitral regurgitation by transoesophageal echocardiography.

Authors:  A Vitarelli; Y Conde; E Cimino; T Leone; I D'Angeli; S D'Orazio; S Stellato
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  What is the most appropriate variable for estimation of mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure by transesophageal pulsed Doppler echocardiography?

Authors:  H Habu; T Sasaki; T Naito; H Ikawa; Y Hirano; K Ishikawa; R Katori
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1995-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.