PROBLEM: The role played by microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity (MIAC) in preterm pre-labor rupture of membranes (pPROM) is inadequately characterized, in part because of reliance on cultivation-based methods. METHOD OF STUDY: Amniotic fluid from 204 subjects with pPROM was analyzed with both cultivation and molecular methods in a retrospective cohort study. Broad-range and group-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays targeted small subunit ribosomal DNA (rDNA), or other gene sequences, from bacteria, fungi, and archaea. Results were correlated with measurements of host inflammation, as well as pregnancy and perinatal outcomes. RESULTS: The prevalence of MIAC was 34% (70/204) by culture, 45% (92/204) by PCR, and 50% (101/204) by both methods combined. The number of bacterial species revealed by PCR (44 species-level phylotypes) was greater than that by culture (14 species) and included as-yet uncultivated taxa. Some taxa detected by PCR have been previously associated with the gastrointestinal tract (e.g., Coprobacillus sp.), the mouth (e.g., Rothia dentocariosa), or the vagina in the setting of bacterial vaginosis (e.g., Atopobium vaginae). The relative risk for histologic chorioamnionitis was 2.1 for a positive PCR [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.4-3.0] and 2.0 for a positive culture (95% CI, 1.4-2.7). Bacterial rDNA abundance exhibited a dose relationship with gestational age at delivery (R(2) = 0.26; P < 0.01). A positive PCR was associated with lower mean birthweight, and with higher rates of respiratory distress syndrome and necrotizing enterocolitis (P < 0.05 for each outcome). CONCLUSION: MIAC in pPROM is more common than previously recognized and is associated in some cases with uncultivated taxa, some of which are typically associated with the gastrointestinal tract. The detection of MIAC by molecular methods has clinical significance.
PROBLEM: The role played by microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity (MIAC) in preterm pre-labor rupture of membranes (pPROM) is inadequately characterized, in part because of reliance on cultivation-based methods. METHOD OF STUDY: Amniotic fluid from 204 subjects with pPROM was analyzed with both cultivation and molecular methods in a retrospective cohort study. Broad-range and group-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays targeted small subunit ribosomal DNA (rDNA), or other gene sequences, from bacteria, fungi, and archaea. Results were correlated with measurements of host inflammation, as well as pregnancy and perinatal outcomes. RESULTS: The prevalence of MIAC was 34% (70/204) by culture, 45% (92/204) by PCR, and 50% (101/204) by both methods combined. The number of bacterial species revealed by PCR (44 species-level phylotypes) was greater than that by culture (14 species) and included as-yet uncultivated taxa. Some taxa detected by PCR have been previously associated with the gastrointestinal tract (e.g., Coprobacillus sp.), the mouth (e.g., Rothia dentocariosa), or the vagina in the setting of bacterial vaginosis (e.g., Atopobium vaginae). The relative risk for histologic chorioamnionitis was 2.1 for a positive PCR [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.4-3.0] and 2.0 for a positive culture (95% CI, 1.4-2.7). Bacterial rDNA abundance exhibited a dose relationship with gestational age at delivery (R(2) = 0.26; P < 0.01). A positive PCR was associated with lower mean birthweight, and with higher rates of respiratory distress syndrome and necrotizing enterocolitis (P < 0.05 for each outcome). CONCLUSION: MIAC in pPROM is more common than previously recognized and is associated in some cases with uncultivated taxa, some of which are typically associated with the gastrointestinal tract. The detection of MIAC by molecular methods has clinical significance.
Authors: A Yağci; N Cerikçioğlu; M E Kaufmann; H Malnick; G Söyletir; F Babacan; T L Pitt Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2000-09 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: P Toti; C De Felice; M Stumpo; K Schürfeld; L Di Leo; R Vatti; G Bianciardi; G Buonocore; T A Seemayer; P Luzi Journal: Hum Pathol Date: 2000-09 Impact factor: 3.466
Authors: Carolyn Gardella; Donald E Riley; Jane Hitti; Kathy Agnew; John N Krieger; David Eschenbach Journal: Am J Perinatol Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Paul W Lepp; Mary M Brinig; Cleber C Ouverney; Katherine Palm; Gary C Armitage; David A Relman Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-04-05 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Michael J Ferris; Alicia Masztal; Kenneth E Aldridge; J Dennis Fortenberry; Paul L Fidel; David H Martin Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2004-02-13 Impact factor: 3.090
Authors: Ronald F Lamont; Chia-Ling Nhan-Chang; Jack D Sobel; Kimberly Workowski; Agustin Conde-Agudelo; Roberto Romero Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2011-04-02 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: E Vaisbuch; R Romero; O Erez; J P Kusanovic; S Mazaki-Tovi; F Gotsch; V Romero; C Ward; T Chaiworapongsa; P Mittal; Y Sorokin; S S Hassan Journal: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 7.299
Authors: Roberto Romero; Jezid Miranda; Juan P Kusanovic; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Piya Chaemsaithong; Alicia Martinez; Francesca Gotsch; Zhong Dong; Ahmed I Ahmed; Majid Shaman; Kia Lannaman; Bo Hyun Yoon; Sonia S Hassan; Chong J Kim; Steven J Korzeniewski; Lami Yeo; Yeon Mee Kim Journal: J Perinat Med Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 1.901
Authors: Anne L Dunlop; Jennifer G Mulle; Erin P Ferranti; Sara Edwards; Alexis B Dunn; Elizabeth J Corwin Journal: Adv Neonatal Care Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 1.968
Authors: Vanessa Topping; Roberto Romero; Nandor Gabor Than; Adi L Tarca; Zhonghui Xu; Sun Young Kim; Bing Wang; Lami Yeo; Chong Jai Kim; Sonia S Hassan; Jung-Sun Kim Journal: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med Date: 2012-11-23
Authors: J Reinhard; N Sänger; L C Hanker; S Peiffer; J Yuan; V A J Kempf; F Louwen Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 2.915
Authors: Roberto Romero; Piya Chaemsaithong; Steven J Korzeniewski; Juan P Kusanovic; Nikolina Docheva; Alicia Martinez-Varea; Ahmed I Ahmed; Bo Hyun Yoon; Sonia S Hassan; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Lami Yeo Journal: J Perinat Med Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 1.901