Literature DB >> 20331385

Informed participation in cancer screening: the facts are changing, and GPs are going to feel it.

Linn Getz, John Brodersen.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2010        PMID： 20331385      PMCID： PMC3440607          DOI： 10.3109/02813431003625410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care        ISSN： 0281-3432            Impact factor:   2.581


× No keyword cloud information.
  14 in total

Review 1.  Screening for colorectal cancer using the faecal occult blood test, Hemoccult.

Authors:  P Hewitson; P Glasziou; L Irwig; B Towler; E Watson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-01-24

2.  Addressing the future role of general practice at the 16th Nordic Congress in Copenhagen 2009: how can we ensure sustainable care in a complex world of evidence, context, organization, and personal care?

Authors:  Susanne Reventlow; Henrik Sångren; John Brodersen; Bo Christensen; Anette Grauengaard; Dorte Jarbøl; Marianne Rosendal; Jens Søndergaard
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.581

3.  The trouble with screening.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-04-11       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Life and Death. It is not wrong to say no.

Authors:  Iona Heath
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-06-23

5.  Spontaneous regression of localized neuroblastoma detected by mass screening.

Authors:  K Yamamoto; R Hanada; A Kikuchi; M Ichikawa; T Aihara; E Oguma; T Moritani; Y Shimanuki; M Tanimura; Y Hayashi
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Consequences of screening in lung cancer: development and dimensionality of a questionnaire.

Authors:  John Brodersen; Hanne Thorsen; Svend Kreiner
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 5.725

7.  "Benign" tumors and "early detection" in mammography-screened patients of a natural cohort with breast cancer.

Authors:  S Y Moody-Ayers; C K Wells; A R Feinstein
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2000-04-24

8.  Outcomes of screening to prevent cancer: analysis of cumulative incidence of cervical abnormality and modelling of cases and deaths prevented.

Authors:  A E Raffle; B Alden; M Quinn; P J Babb; M T Brett
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-04-26

9.  Consequences of Screening in Breast Cancer (COS-BC): development of a questionnaire.

Authors:  John Brodersen; Hanne Thorsen
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.581

Review 10.  Overdiagnosis in publicly organised mammography screening programmes: systematic review of incidence trends.

Authors:  Karsten Juhl Jørgensen; Peter C Gøtzsche
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-09
View more
  4 in total

1.  Early detection of prostate cancer: is screening in general practice justifiable?

Authors:  Emil L Sigurdsson
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 2.581

2.  Milestones in the development of Nordic general practice*.

Authors:  Johann A Sigurdsson
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 2.581

3.  Marginal public health gain of screening for colorectal cancer: modelling study, based on WHO and national databases in the Nordic countries.

Authors:  Johann A Sigurdsson; Linn Getz; Göran Sjönell; Paula Vainiomäki; John Brodersen
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2012-04-22       Impact factor: 2.431

4.  Psychosocial consequences of receiving false-positive colorectal cancer screening results: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Eva Lykke Toft; Sara Enggaard Kaae; Jessica Malmqvist; John Brodersen
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2019-05-11       Impact factor: 2.581
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.