Literature DB >> 20329809

Why are natural sounds detected faster than pips?

Clara Suied1, Patrick Susini, Stephen McAdams, Roy D Patterson.   

Abstract

Simple reaction times (RTs) were used to measure differences in processing time between natural animal sounds and artificial sounds. When the artificial stimuli were sequences of short tone pulses, the animal sounds were detected faster than the artificial sounds. The animal sounds were then compared with acoustically modified versions (white noise modulated by the temporal envelope of the animal sounds). No differences in RTs were observed between the animal sounds and their modified counterparts. These results show that the fast detection observed for natural sounds, in the present task, could be explained by their acoustic properties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20329809     DOI: 10.1121/1.3310196

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  4 in total

1.  Cross-modal conflicts in object recognition: determining the influence of object category.

Authors:  Jessica N Vogler; Kirsteen Titchener
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Temporal coherence and attention in auditory scene analysis.

Authors:  Shihab A Shamma; Mounya Elhilali; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 13.837

3.  Auditory roughness elicits defense reactions.

Authors:  Marine Taffou; Clara Suied; Isabelle Viaud-Delmon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Fast response to human voices in autism.

Authors:  I-Fan Lin; Trevor R Agus; Clara Suied; Daniel Pressnitzer; Takashi Yamada; Yoko Komine; Nobumasa Kato; Makio Kashino
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.