Literature DB >> 2032564

Comparison of 'normal' TMJ-function in Class I, II, and III individuals.

B Zimmer1, A Jäger, D Kubein-Meesenburg.   

Abstract

Fifty-seven non-orthodontically treated young adults, judged as either clinically healthy or with only mild symptoms of TMJ-dysfunction, were divided into groups according to their sagittal molar relationship (Class I-, Class II-, and Class III-group). All underwent a standardized clinical and axiographic examination with an axiographic recording device (SAS-SYSTEM). The comparison of the lengths of the axiographical protrusive curves showed significantly higher values in the Class II group than in the Class I (P less than 0.01) and in the Class I group than in the Class III group (P less than 0.001). Analogous differences could be found in clinical protrusive measurements at the incisal point and in lateral excursions. It was concluded that the protrusive condylar movement capacity coincides with the dental sagittal relationship. In opening, significant differences were seen axiographically (Class I v. Class III: P less than 0.001; Class II v. Class III: P less than 0.01), but not clinically. Since axiographic measurements show only condyle translation, but not rotation in contrast to measurements at the incisal point, it can be concluded that the differences in opening are also translatory and not rotational. Measurements of the average change of curvature of axiographic tracings showed significantly less curved protrusive tracings in Class III than in Class I (P less than 0.001) and Class II individuals (P less than 0.01), supporting the concept that in the Class III group condyle movement is restricted to the straight posterior slope of the tubercle.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2032564     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/13.1.27

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  6 in total

1.  [Changes in opening mobility due to surgical advancement of the mandible].

Authors:  B Zimmer; D Engelke; R J Radlanski; D Kubein-Meesenburg
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1991-04

2.  Axiographic evaluation of mandibular mobility in children with angle Class-II/2 malocclusion (deep overbite).

Authors:  C Anders; W Harzer; L Eckardt
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Influence of Occlusal Splint on Mandibular Movements in Patients with Bruxism: a Comparative Pilot Study.

Authors:  Josip Škaričić; Samir Čimić; Sonja Kraljević-Šimunković; Marko Vuletić; Nikša Dulčić
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2020-09

4.  Sagittal Condylar Inclination and Transversal Condylar Inclination in Different Skeletal Classes.

Authors:  Anahit Lewandowska; Katarzyna Mańka-Malara; Jolanta Kostrzewa-Janicka
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  Prospective closed treatment of nondisplaced and nondislocated condylar neck and head fractures versus open reposition internal fixation of displaced and dislocated fractures.

Authors:  Constantin A Landes; Kai Day; Ruben Lipphardt; Robert Sader
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-07

6.  Automated Real-Time Evaluation of Condylar Movement in Relation to Three-Dimensional Craniofacial and Temporomandibular Morphometry in Patients with Facial Asymmetry.

Authors:  Won-June Lee; Ki-Ho Park; Yoon-Goo Kang; Su-Jung Kim
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 3.576

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.